The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oxidation of methane by a biological dicopper centre
Open accessAbstract
Vast world reserves of methane gas are underutilized as a feedstock for the production of liquid fuels and chemicals owing to the lack of economical and sustainable strategies for the selective oxidation of methane to methanol. Current processes to activate the strong C–H bond (104 kcal mol-1) in methane require high temperatures, are costly and inefficient, and produce waste. In nature, methanotrophic bacteria perform this reaction under ambient conditions using metalloenzymes called methane monooxygenases (MMOs). MMOs thus provide the optimal model for an efficient, environmentally sound catalyst. There are two types of MMO. Soluble MMO (sMMO) is expressed by several strains of methanotroph under copper-limited conditions and oxidizes methane with a well-characterized catalytic di-iron centre. Particulate MMO (pMMO) is an integral membrane metalloenzyme produced by all methanotrophs and is composed of three subunits, pmoA, pmoB and pmoC, arranged in a trimeric α3β3γ3 complex. Despite 20 years of research and the availability of two crystal structures, the metal composition and location of the pMMO metal active site are not known. Here we show that pMMO activity is dependent on copper, not iron, and that the copper active site is located in the soluble domains of the pmoB subunit rather than within the membrane. Recombinant soluble fragments of pmoB (spmoB) bind copper and have propylene and methane oxidation activities. Disruption of each copper centre in spmoB by mutagenesis indicates that the active site is a dicopper centre. These findings help resolve the pMMO controversy and provide a promising new approach to developing environmentally friendly C–H oxidation catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cu(I) binding and transfer by the N terminus of the Wilson disease protein.
Yatsunyk, L. A., & Rosenzweig, A. C. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m609533200 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Cited by
Grundner, S., Markovits, M. A. C., Li, G., Tromp, M., Pidko, E. A., Hensen, E. J. M., Jentys, A., Sanchez-Sanchez, M., & Lercher, J. A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8546 · Cited by 773
Diversity, Physiology, and Niche Differentiation of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea
Hatzenpichler, R. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01960-12 · Cited by 532
Nitrification in agricultural soils: impact, actors and mitigation
Beeckman, F., Motte, H., & Beeckman, T. (2018) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.014 · Cited by 448
Enzymatic functionalization of carbon–hydrogen bonds
Lewis, J. C., Coelho, P. S., & Arnold, F. H. (2011) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c0cs00067a · Cited by 386
Significant Advances in C1 Catalysis: Highly Efficient Catalysts and Catalytic Reactions
Bao, J., Yang, G., Yoneyama, Y., & Tsubaki, N. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.8b03924 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Balasubramanian, R., Smith, S. M., Rawat, S., Yatsunyk, L. A., Stemmler, T. L., & Rosenzweig, A. C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 465
- Issue
- 7294
- Pages
- 115-119
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2074023228
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidation of methane by a biological dicopper centre. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature08992
- The paper
- Balasubramanian, R., Smith, S. M., Rawat, S., Yatsunyk, L. A., Stemmler, T. L., & Rosenzweig, A. C. (2010). Oxidation of methane by a biological dicopper centre. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.