The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations
Open accessAbstract
Negative feedback is common in biological processes and can increase a system’s stability to internal and external perturbations. But at the molecular level, control loops always involve signalling steps with finite rates for random births and deaths of individual molecules. Here we show, by developing mathematical tools that merge control and information theory with physical chemistry, that seemingly mild constraints on these rates place severe limits on the ability to suppress molecular fluctuations. Specifically, the minimum standard deviation in abundances decreases with the quartic root of the number of signalling events, making it extremely expensive to increase accuracy. Our results are formulated in terms of experimental observables, and existing data show that cells use brute force when noise suppression is essential; for example, regulatory genes are transcribed tens of thousands of times per cell cycle. The theory challenges conventional beliefs about biochemical accuracy and presents an approach to the rigorous analysis of poorly characterized biological systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise
Newman, J. R. S., Ghaemmaghami, S., Ihmels, J., Breslow, D. K., Noble, M., DeRisi, J. L., & Weissman, J. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04785 · Cited by 1,483
Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level
Cai, L., Friedman, N., & Xie, X. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04599 · Cited by 1,145
Effects of Molecular Memory and Bursting on Fluctuations in Gene Expression
Pedraza, J. M., & Paulsson, J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144331 · Cited by 404
Self-citation
Cited by
Roles for MicroRNAs in Conferring Robustness to Biological Processes
Ebert, M. S., & Sharp, P. A. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,564
Atkinson, G. C., Tenson, T., & Hauryliuk, V. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023479 · Cited by 447
A problem of persistence: still more questions than answers?
Balaban, N. Q., Gerdes, K., Lewis, K., & McKinney, J. D. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3076 · Cited by 263
Fluctuations in p53 Signaling Allow Escape from Cell-Cycle Arrest
Reyes, J., Chen, J.-Y., Stewart-Ornstein, J., Karhohs, K. W., Mock, C. S., & Lahav, G. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.031 · Cited by 149
Single-molecule imaging of transcription dynamics in somatic stem cells
Wheat, J. C., Sella, Y., Willcockson, M., Skoultchi, A. I., Bergman, A., Singer, R. H., & Steidl, U. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2432-4 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Lestas, I., Vinnicombe, G., & Paulsson, J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 467
- Issue
- 7312
- Pages
- 174-178
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2076367743
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09333
- The paper
- Lestas, I., Vinnicombe, G., & Paulsson, J. (2010). Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.