Cited by 88Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Single-molecule imaging of transcription dynamics in somatic stem cells

Open access
Wheat, Justin C., Sella, Yehonatan, Willcockson, Michael, Skoultchi, Arthur I., Bergman, Aviv, Singer, Robert H., Steidl, Ulrich·2020·Nature

Abstract

Molecular noise is a natural phenomenon that is inherent to all biological systems 1,2. How stochastic processes give rise to the robust outcomes that support tissue homeostasis remains unclear. Here we use single-molecule RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) on mouse stem cells derived from haematopoietic tissue to measure the transcription dynamics of three key genes that encode transcription factors: PU.1 (also known as Spi1), Gata1 and Gata2. We find that infrequent, stochastic bursts of transcription result in the co-expression of these antagonistic transcription factors in the majority of haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Moreover, by pairing smFISH with time-lapse microscopy and the analysis of pedigrees, we find that although individual stem-cell clones produce descendants that are in transcriptionally related states-akin to a transcriptional priming phenomenon-the underlying transition dynamics between states are best captured by stochastic and reversible models. As such, a stochastic process can produce cellular behaviours that may be incorrectly inferred to have arisen from deterministic dynamics. We propose a model whereby the intrinsic stochasticity of gene expression facilitates, rather than impedes, the concomitant maintenance of transcriptional plasticity and stem cell robustness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-2432-4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Key hematopoietic TFs are expressed in smooth, overlapping gradients throughout stem and progenitor populations, whereas their target genes display cell-state-specific expression patterns.

    “single-cell transcriptomics1,2,3 and imaging-based4 studies have demonstrated that key TFs are expressed in smooth, overlapping gradients throughout the stem and progenitor populations (Figure 1A, top row); by contrast, the target genes regulated by these factors display cell-state-specific expression patterns (Figure 1A, bottom row).”

    From Design principles of cell-state-specific enhancers in hematopoiesis (2025) · cites this paper as [4]

    The “PU.1 and Gata TF co-expression in HSPC” section reports substantial co-expression across the progenitor populations studied, and “Single molecule imaging in primary HSPC” reports different transcription of myeloid and erythroid genes in PU.1-high cells. These passages support overlapping TF expression and state-associated differences in selected genes, but do not establish smooth gradients throughout stem and progenitor populations or cell-state-specific expression patterns for target genes generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PU.1 can engage in competitive interactions with transcriptional regulators such as GATA1 to promote myeloid differentiation.

    “PU.1 can also engage in competitive interactions with transcriptional regulators such as GATA1 to promote myeloid differentiation (Strasser et al., 2018; Wheat et al., 2020; Raghav and Gangenahalli, 2021).”

    From PU.1 is required to restrain myelopoiesis during chronic inflammatory stress (2023) · cites this paper as Wheat et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]Levsky JM & Singer RH Gene expression and the myth of the average cell. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 4– 6 (2003). 12480334
  2. [5]Gandhi SJ, Zenklusen D, Lionnet T & Singer RH Transcription of functionally related constitutive genes is not coordinated. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18, 27– 34 (2011). 21131977 PMC3058351
  3. [6]Huh D & Paulsson J Random partitioning of molecules at cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 15004– 15009 (2011). 21873252 PMC3169110
  4. [7]Lestas I, Vinnicombe G & Paulsson J Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467, 174– 178 (2010). 20829788 PMC2996232
  5. [9]Tusi BK Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies. Nature 555, 54– 60 (2018). 29466336 PMC5899604
  6. [10]Femino AM, Fay FS, Fogarty K & Singer RH Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science 280, 585– 590 (1998). 9554849
  7. [11]Torre E Rare Cell Detection by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing as Guided by Single-Molecule RNA FISH. cels 6, 171– 179.e5 (2018). PMC6078200 29454938
  8. [12]Chen KH, Boettiger AN, Moffitt JR, Wang S & Zhuang X RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015). 25858977 PMC4662681
  9. [13]Tsanov N smiFISH and FISH-quant - a flexible single RNA detection approach with super-resolution capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e165 (2016). 27599845 PMC5159540
  10. [15]Koschmieder S, Rosenbauer F, Steidl U, Owens BM & Tenen DG Role of transcription factors C/EBPalpha and PU.1 in normal hematopoiesis and leukemia. Int. J. Hematol 81, 368– 377 (2005). 16158816
  11. [18]Rosenbauer F Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1. Nat. Genet 36, 624– 630 (2004). 15146183
  12. [19]Steidl U Essential role of Jun family transcription factors in PU.1 knockdown-induced leukemic stem cells. Nat. Genet 38, 1269– 1277 (2006). 17041602
  13. [21]Skinner SO Single-cell analysis of transcription kinetics across the cell cycle. eLife 5, e12175 (2016). 26824388 PMC4801054
  14. [23]Paul F Transcriptional Heterogeneity and Lineage Commitment in Myeloid Progenitors. Cell 163, 1663– 1677 (2015). 26627738
  15. [26]Torre EA A Comparison Between Single Cell RNA Sequencing And Single Molecule RNA FISH For Rare Cell Analysis. (2017) doi: 10.1101/138289. · DOI
  16. [27]Chou ST Graded repression of PU.1/Sfpi1 gene transcription by GATA factors regulates hematopoietic cell fate. Blood 114, 983– 994 (2009). 19491391 PMC2721792
  17. [28]Doré LC, Chlon TM, Brown CD, White KP & Crispino JD Chromatin occupancy analysis reveals genome-wide GATA factor switching during hematopoiesis. Blood 119, 3724– 3733 (2012). 22383799 PMC3335379
  18. [29]Grass JA GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 100, 8811– 8816 (2003). 12857954 PMC166395
  19. [30]Singer ZS Dynamic heterogeneity and DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell 55, 319– 331 (2014). 25038413 PMC4104113
  20. [31]T Gillespie D A General Method of Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions. vol. 22 (1976).
  21. [32]Haghverdi L, Büttner M, Wolf FA, Buettner F & Theis FJ Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat. Methods 13, 845– 848 (2016). 27571553
  22. [33]Hoppe PS Early myeloid lineage choice is not initiated by random PU.1 to GATA1 protein ratios. Nature 535, 299– 302 (2016). 27411635
  23. [34]Buggenthin F Prospective identification of hematopoietic lineage choice by deep learning. Nat Methods 14, 403– 406 (2017). 28218899 PMC5376497
  24. [36]Arinobu Y Reciprocal Activation of GATA-1 and PU.1 Marks Initial Specification of Hematopoietic Stem Cells into Myeloerythroid and Myelolymphoid Lineages. Cell Stem Cell 1, 416– 427 (2007). 18371378
  25. [37]Laslo P Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates. Cell 126, 755– 766 (2006). 16923394
  26. [38]Hormoz S Inferring Cell-State Transition Dynamics from Lineage Trees and Endpoint Single-Cell Measurements. Cell Syst 3, 419– 433.e8 (2016). 27883889 PMC5142829
  27. [39]Loeffler D Mouse and human HSPC immobilization in liquid culture by CD43- or CD44-antibody coating. Blood 131, 1425– 1429 (2018). 29453290
  28. [40]Manno GL RNA velocity of single cells. Nature 560, 494 (2018). 30089906 PMC6130801
  29. [41]Hilsenbeck O Software tools for single-cell tracking and quantification of cellular and molecular properties. Nat. Biotechnol 34, 703– 706 (2016). 27404877

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wheat, J. C., Sella, Y., Willcockson, M., Skoultchi, A. I., Bergman, A., Singer, R. H., & Steidl, U.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Steidl, Ulrich
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-06-24
Volume
583
Issue
7816
Pages
431-436
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3037155407
Cited by
88
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL139487)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA047729)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA217092, P30CA013330)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (F30GM122308, R01GM116143, T32GM007288)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS083085)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
transcriptional noise, adult stem cells, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, PU.1, GATA-1, GATA2, transcriptional bursting, stochastic gene expression, transcriptional priming, transcriptional plasticity, stem cell heterogeneity, tissue homeostasis, lineage tracing
MeSH terms
Single Molecule Imaging, Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Clone Cells, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pedigree, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Stochastic Processes, Transcription, Genetic, Trans-Activators, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, GATA1 Transcription Factor, GATA2 Transcription Factor, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Adult Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review