Cited by 166Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Origin of Saturn's Rings and Inner Moons by Mass Removal from a Lost Titan-Sized Satellite

Canup, Robin M.·2010·Nature

Abstract

The origin of Saturn's rings has not been adequately explained. The current rings are more than 90 to 95 per cent water ice, which implies that initially they were almost pure ice because they are continually polluted by rocky meteoroids. In contrast, a half-rock, half-ice mixture (similar to the composition of many of the satellites in the outer Solar System) would generally be expected. Previous ring origin theories invoke the collisional disruption of a small moon, or the tidal disruption of a comet during a close passage by Saturn. These models are improbable and/or struggle to account for basic properties of the rings, including their icy composition. Saturn has only one large satellite, Titan, whereas Jupiter has four large satellites; additional large satellites probably existed originally but were lost as they spiralled into Saturn. Here I report numerical simulations of the tidal removal of mass from a differentiated, Titan-sized satellite as it migrates inward towards Saturn. Planetary tidal forces preferentially strip material from the satellite's outer icy layers, while its rocky core remains intact and is lost to collision with the planet. The result is a pure ice ring much more massive than Saturn's current rings. As the ring evolves, its mass decreases and icy moons are spawned from its outer edge with estimated masses consistent with Saturn's ice-rich moons interior to and including Tethys.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09661

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A retrograde ring could represent the tidal disruption of a captured smaller planet in the system, which then fills a significant portion of J1407b's Hill sphere.

    “Thus, a retrograde ring could represent the tidal disruption of a captured smaller planet in the system (Canup 2010;Hyodo et al., 2017), which then fills a significant portion of J1407b's Hill sphere.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canup, R. M.
Affiliations
Southwest Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Canup, Robin M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-12
Volume
468
Issue
7326
Pages
943-946
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2049243255
Cited by
166
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
rings, ring origin, Titan, tidal disruption, mass removal, icy satellites, numerical simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review