The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
X chromosome dosage compensation via enhanced transcriptional elongation in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
The evolution of sex chromosomes has resulted in numerous species in which females inherit two X chromosomes but males have a single X, thus requiring dosage compensation. MSL (Male-specific lethal) complex increases transcription on the single X chromosome of Drosophila males to equalize expression of X-linked genes between the sexes. The biochemical mechanisms used for dosage compensation must function over a wide dynamic range of transcription levels and differential expression patterns. It has been proposed that the MSL complex regulates transcriptional elongation to control dosage compensation, a model subsequently supported by mapping of the MSL complex and MSL-dependent histone 4 lysine 16 acetylation to the bodies of X-linked genes in males, with a bias towards 3′ ends. However, experimental analysis of MSL function at the mechanistic level has been challenging owing to the small magnitude of the chromosome-wide effect and the lack of an in vitro system for biochemical analysis. Here we use global run-on sequencing (GRO-seq) to examine the specific effect of the MSL complex on RNA Polymerase II (RNAP II) on a genome-wide level. Results indicate that the MSL complex enhances transcription by facilitating the progression of RNAP II across the bodies of active X-linked genes. Improving transcriptional output downstream of typical gene-specific controls may explain how dosage compensation can be imposed on the diverse set of genes along an entire chromosome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome
Wang, Z., Zang, C., Rosenfeld, J. A., Schones, D. E., Barski, A., Cuddapah, S., Cui, K., Roh, T.-Y., Peng, W., Zhang, M. Q., et al. (2008) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.154 · Cited by 2,331
Nechaev, S., Fargo, D. C., dos Santos, G., Liu, L., Gao, Y., & Adelman, K. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181421 · Cited by 424
Cited by
Understanding the language of Lys36 methylation at histone H3
Wagner, E. J., & Carpenter, P. B. (2012) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3274 · Cited by 936
Precise Maps of RNA Polymerase Reveal How Promoters Direct Initiation and Pausing
Kwak, H., Fuda, N. J., Core, L. J., & Lis, J. T. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229386 · Cited by 849
Self-citationMahat, D. B., Kwak, H., Booth, G. T., Jonkers, I. H., Danko, C. G., Patel, R. K., Waters, C. T., Munson, K., Core, L. J., & Lis, J. T. (2016) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.086 · Cited by 508
Self-citationMohn, F., Sienski, G., Handler, D., & Brennecke, J. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.031 · Cited by 414
Deng, X., Hiatt, J. B., Nguyen, D. K., Ercan, S., Sturgill, D., Hillier, L. W., Schlesinger, F., Davis, C. A., Reinke, V. J., Gingeras, T. R., et al. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.948 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Larschan, E., Bishop, E. P., Kharchenko, P. V., Core, L. J., Lis, J. T., Park, P. J., & Kuroda, M. I.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 471
- Issue
- 7336
- Pages
- 115-118
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2110638928
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: X chromosome dosage compensation via enhanced transcriptional elongation in Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature09757
- The paper
- Larschan, E., Bishop, E. P., Kharchenko, P. V., Core, L. J., Lis, J. T., Park, P. J., & Kuroda, M. I. (2011). X chromosome dosage compensation via enhanced transcriptional elongation in Drosophila. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09757
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.