Cited by 245Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

Interaction-based quantum metrology showing scaling beyond the Heisenberg limit

Open access
Napolitano, M., Koschorreck, M., Dubost, B., Behbood, N., Sewell, R. J., Mitchell, M. W.·2011·Nature

Abstract

Quantum metrology aims to use entanglement and other quantum resources to improve precision measurement. An interferometer using N independent particles to measure a parameter χ can achieve at best the standard quantum limit of sensitivity, δχ ∝ N(-1/2). However, using N entangled particles and exotic states, such an interferometer can in principle achieve the Heisenberg limit, δχ ∝ N(-1). Recent theoretical work has argued that interactions among particles may be a valuable resource for quantum metrology, allowing scaling beyond the Heisenberg limit. Specifically, a k-particle interaction will produce sensitivity δχ ∝ N(-k) with appropriate entangled states and δχ ∝ N(-(k-1/2)) even without entanglement. Here we demonstrate 'super-Heisenberg' scaling of δχ ∝ N(-3/2) in a nonlinear, non-destructive measurement of the magnetization of an atomic ensemble. We use fast optical nonlinearities to generate a pairwise photon-photon interaction (corresponding to k = 2) while preserving quantum-noise-limited performance. We observe super-Heisenberg scaling over two orders of magnitude in N, limited at large numbers by higher-order nonlinear effects, in good agreement with theory. For a measurement of limited duration, super-Heisenberg scaling allows the nonlinear measurement to overtake in sensitivity a comparable linear measurement with the same number of photons. In other situations, however, higher-order nonlinearities prevent this crossover from occurring, reflecting the subtle relationship between scaling and sensitivity in nonlinear systems. Our work shows that interparticle interactions can improve sensitivity in a quantum-limited measurement, and experimentally demonstrates a new resource for quantum metrology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature09778

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exceptions to the limitation of m include the Dicke model, the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model, and the Mølmer-Sørensen interaction.

    “Exceptions to this include the Dicke model [40] where collective coherence leads to superradiance, the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model [41], where all particles interact with each other, and the Mølmer-Sørensen interaction [42], in which an ensemble of ions are effectively coupled by a spatially uniform electromagnetic field.”

    From Enhancing the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries (2017) · cites this paper as [41]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Napolitano, M., Koschorreck, M., Dubost, B., Behbood, N., Sewell, R. J., & Mitchell, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Photonic Sciences (ES)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Napolitano, M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-03
Volume
471
Issue
7339
Pages
486-489
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2122138985
Cited by
245
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
21.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
quantum metrology, Heisenberg limit, interparticle interactions, nonlinear measurements, non-destructive measurement, atomic magnetization, atomic ensembles, photon-photon interaction, precision measurement, quantum noise, higher-order nonlinearities, entanglement, standard quantum limit, quantum Fisher information, quantum Fisher information matrix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review