The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction
Open accessAbstract
The wavefunction is the complex distribution used to completely describe a quantum system, and is central to quantum theory. But despite its fundamental role, it is typically introduced as an abstract element of the theory with no explicit definition. Rather, physicists come to a working understanding of the wavefunction through its use to calculate measurement outcome probabilities by way of the Born rule. At present, the wavefunction is determined through tomographic methods, which estimate the wavefunction most consistent with a diverse collection of measurements. The indirectness of these methods compounds the problem of defining the wavefunction. Here we show that the wavefunction can be measured directly by the sequential measurement of two complementary variables of the system. The crux of our method is that the first measurement is performed in a gentle way through weak measurement, so as not to invalidate the second. The result is that the real and imaginary components of the wavefunction appear directly on our measurement apparatus. We give an experimental example by directly measuring the transverse spatial wavefunction of a single photon, a task not previously realized by any method. We show that the concept is universal, being applicable to other degrees of freedom of the photon, such as polarization or frequency, and to other quantum systems—for example, electron spins, SQUIDs (superconducting quantum interference devices) and trapped ions. Consequently, this method gives the wavefunction a straightforward and general definition in terms of a specific set of experimental operations. We expect it to expand the range of quantum systems that can be characterized and to initiate new avenues in fundamental quantum theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
A single quantum cannot be cloned
Wootters, W. K., & Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/299802a0 · Cited by 5,406 · cited 1×
“Indeed, it is impossible to determine a completely unknown wavefunction of single system [20].”
BackgroundSmithey, D. T., Beck, M., Raymer, M. G., & Faridani, A. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.1244 · Cited by 1,538
Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characterization, and Utilization
White, A. G., James, D. F. V., Eberhard, P. H., & Kwiat, P. G. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3103 · Cited by 511
Cited by
Colloquium: Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications
Dressel, J., Malik, M., Miatto, F. M., Jordan, A. N., & Boyd, R. W. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.307 · Cited by 698
Using coherence to enhance function in chemical and biophysical systems
Scholes, G. D., Fleming, G. R., Chen, L. X., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Buchleitner, A., Coker, D. F., Engel, G. S., van Grondelle, R., Ishizaki, A., Jonas, D. M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21425 · Cited by 668
Self-citationProcedure for Direct Measurement of General Quantum States Using Weak Measurement
Lundeen, J. S., & Bamber, C. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.070402 · Cited by 281
Self-citationFull characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement
Salvail, J. Z., Agnew, M., Johnson, A. S., Bolduc, E., Leach, J., & Boyd, R. W. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.24 · Cited by 196
Self-probing of molecules with high harmonic generation
Haessler, S., Caillat, J., & Salières, P. (2011) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/0953-4075/44/20/203001 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundeen, J. S., Sutherland, B., Patel, A., Stewart, C., & Bamber, C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 474
- Issue
- 7350
- Pages
- 188-191
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2030959471
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10120
- The paper
- Lundeen, J. S., Sutherland, B., Patel, A., Stewart, C., & Bamber, C. (2011). Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.