CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Procedure for Direct Measurement of General Quantum States Using Weak Measurement

Lundeen, Jeff S., Bamber, Charles·2012·Physical Review Letters
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.108.070402
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.108.070402

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The matrix elements of a quantum system can be obtained by considering the weak measurement of an observable composed of three incompatible projection operators Π_ij = π_j π_D π_i.

    “As Lundeen and his co-workers [11] studied, the matrix elements of a quantum system can be obtained by considering the weak measurement of an observable composed of three incompatible projection operator:”

    From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The weak average of π_DD π_ij can be obtained as Eq 41 using the method introduced in Refs.[11,32].

    “If we assume that the polarizers represented by the projection operator π ij and π DD causing displacement along x and y directions, respectively, we can get the weak average of π DD π ij by using the method introduced in Refs.[11,32] as”

    From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The direct measurement of general quantum state by using weak measurement has been studied in Refs.[11,15].

    “The direct measurement of general quantum state by using weak measurement has been studied in Refs.[11,15].”

    From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1038/nature10120 · DOI
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.2847 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/387471a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.052107 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRev.40.749 · DOI · Paper page
  6. K. Husimi, 1940, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn., 22, 264
  7. 10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4528 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4344 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.253603 · DOI
  12. 10.1364/OL.28.001317 · DOI
  13. 10.1364/OL.30.003365 · DOI
  14. U. Leonhardt, 1997, Measuring the Quantum State of Light
  15. 10.1088/1464-4266/7/12/037 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1351 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1063/1.3518209 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.333.6043.690 · DOI
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.043601 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.203902 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032111 · DOI
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2405 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.52.32 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00504-8 · DOI
  25. 10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/287 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.026804 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/nphys1641 · DOI
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1005774108 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.02.042 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.020404 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1152697 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.173601 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.133603 · DOI
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.163602 · DOI
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.080503 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1107 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.220405 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.110409 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.012103 · DOI
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.240401 · DOI
  41. J. von Neumann, 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, 10.1063/1.3061789 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.11 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.11.037 · DOI
  44. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.044103 · DOI
  45. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/10/103009 · DOI
  46. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052102 · DOI
  47. 10.1142/S0219749910006502 · DOI
  48. 10.1088/0305-4470/39/6/014 · DOI
  49. 10.1103/RevModPhys.17.195 · DOI
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.012119 · DOI
  51. 10.1364/JOSA.58.001256 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevD.13.869 · DOI
  53. I. Bengtsson, 2007, Foundations of Probability and Physics—4
  54. R. Shankar, 1994, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 10.1007/978-1-4757-0576-8 · DOI
  55. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.130402 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lundeen, J. S., & Bamber, C.
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2012-02-13
Volume
108
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0031-9007
  • 1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.108.070402
Cited by
281
References
3
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review