CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement

Salvail, Jeff Z., Agnew, Megan, Johnson, Allan S., Bolduc, Eliot, Leach, Jonathan, Boyd, Robert W.·2013·Nature Photonics
DOI 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The direct measurement of a photon polarization state in two-dimensional system and direct measurement of density matrix of a single photon polarization state in pure and mixed state cases showed the power of weak measurement technique in state determination processes.

    “In particular, the direct measurement of a photon polarization state in two dimensional system [14] and direct measurement of density matrix of a single photon polarization state in pure and mixed state cases [26] showed the power of weak measurement technique in state determination processes.”

    From Direct measurement methods of density matrix of an entangled quantum state (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. D'Ariano, G. M., Paris, M. G. A. & Sacchi, M. F. Quantum tomography. Adv. Imag. Electron. Phys. 128, 205–308 (2003). · DOI
  2. White, A. G., James, D. F. V., Munro, W. J. & Kwiat, P. G. Exploring Hilbert space: accurate characterization of quantum information. Phys. Rev. A 65, 012301 (2001). · DOI
  3. Itatani, J. et al. Tomographic imaging of molecular orbitals. Nature 432, 867–871 (2004). · DOI
  4. Resch, K. J., Walther, P. & Zeilinger, A. Full characterization of a three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger state using quantum state tomography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 070402 (2005). · DOI
  5. Agnew, M., Leach, J., McLaren, M., Roux, F. S. & Boyd, R. W. Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062101 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lundeen, J. S., Sutherland, B., Patel, A., Stewart, C. & Bamber, C. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature 474, 188–191 (2011). · DOI
  7. Lundeen, J. S. & Bamber, C. Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070402 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dirac, P. A. M. On the analogy between classical and quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 195–199 (1945). · DOI
  9. Chaturvedi, S. et al. Wigner–Weyl correspondence in quantum mechanics for continuous and discrete systems—a Dirac-inspired view. J. Phys. A 39, 1405–1423 (2006). · DOI
  10. Hofmann, H. F. Complex joint probabilities as expressions of reversible transformations in quantum mechanics. New J. Phys. 14, 043031 (2012). · DOI
  11. Feynman, R. P. Negative probability. In Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm Ch. 13 (eds Healy, B. J. & Peat, F. D.) 235–248 (Routledge, 1987).
  12. Leonhardt, U. Quantum-state tomography and discrete Wigner function. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4101–4105 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mukamel, E., Banaszek, K., Walmsley, I. & Dorrer, C. Direct measurement of the spatial Wigner function with area-integrated detection. Opt. Lett. 28, 1317–1319 (2003). · DOI
  14. Smith, B. J., Killett, B., Raymer, M., Walmsley, I. & Banaszek, K. Measurement of the transverse spatial quantum state of light at the single-photon level. Opt. Lett. 30, 3365–3367 (2005). · DOI
  15. Aharonov, Y., Albert, D. Z. & Vaidman, L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351–1354 (1988). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Duck, I. M., Stevenson, I. M. & Sudarshan, E. C. G. The sense in which a weak measurement of a spin-1/2 particle's spin component yields a value 100. Phys. Rev. D 40, 2112–2117 (1989). · DOI
  17. Knight, J. M. & Vaidman L. Weak easurement of photon polarization. Phys. Lett. A 143, 357–361 (1990). · DOI
  18. Ritchie, N. W. M., Story, J. G. & Hulet, R. G. Realization of a measurement of a weak value. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107–1110 (1991). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wiseman, H. Weak values, quantum trajectories, and the cavity-QED experiment on wave–particle correlation. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032111 (2002). · DOI
  20. Solli, D. R., McCormick, C. F., Chiao, R. Y., Popescu, S. & Hickmann, J. M. Fast light, slow light, and phase singularities: A connection to generalized weak values. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 043601 (2004). · DOI
  21. Resch, K. J., Lundeen, J. S. & Steinberg, A. M. Experimental realization of the quantum box problem. Phys. Lett. A 324, 125–131 (2004). · DOI
  22. Johansen, L. Weak measurements with arbitrary probe states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 120402 (2004). · DOI
  23. Pryde, G. J., O'Brien, J. L., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Wiseman, H. M. Measurement of quantum weak values of photon polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 220405 (2005). · DOI
  24. Hosten, O. & Kwiat, P. Observation of the spin hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science 319, 787–790 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  25. Dixon, P. B., Starling, D. J., Jordan, A. N. & Howell, J. C. Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 173601 (2009). · DOI
  26. Popescu, S. Viewpoint: weak measurements just got stronger. Physics 2, 32 (2009). · DOI
  27. Kocsis, S. et al. Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer. Science 332, 1170–1173 (2011). · DOI
  28. Feizpour, A., Xing, X. & Steinberg, A. M. Amplifying single-photon nonlinearity using weak measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133603 (2011). · DOI
  29. De Gosson, M. A. & de Gosson, S. M. Weak values of a quantum observable and the cross-Wigner distribution. Phys. Lett. A 376, 293–296 (2012). · DOI
  30. Edgar, M. P. et al. Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera. Nature Commun. 3, 984 (2012). · DOI
  31. Lundeen J. S. & Resch, K. J. Practical measurement of joint weak values and their connection to the annihilation operator. Phys. Lett. A 334, 337–344 (2005). · DOI
  32. Wootters, W. K. & Fields, B. D. Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements. Ann. Phys. 191, 363–381 (1989). · DOI
  33. Geszti, T. Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak value. Phys. Rev. A 81, 044102 (2010). · DOI
  34. Agnew, M., Leach, J. & Boyd, R. W. Observation of entanglement witnesses for orbital angular momentum states. Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 156 (2012). · DOI
  35. Simmons, S. et al. Entanglement in a solid-state spin ensemble. Nature 470, 69–72 (2011). · DOI
  36. Steger, M. Quantum information storage for over 180 s using donor spins in a 28Si ‘semiconductor vacuum’. Science 336, 1280–1283 (2012). · DOI
  37. Di Lorenzo, A. Full counting statistics of weak-value measurement. Phys. Rev. A 85, 032106 (2012). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salvail, J. Z., Agnew, M., Johnson, A. S., Bolduc, E., Leach, J., & Boyd, R. W.
Venue
Nature Photonics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-03-03
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
316-321
ISSN
  • 1749-4885
  • 1749-4893
DOI
10.1038/nphoton.2013.24
Cited by
196
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review