The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in DNA synthesis technology have enabled the construction of novel genetic pathways and genomic elements, furthering our understanding of system-level phenomena. The ability to synthesize large segments of DNA allows the engineering of pathways and genomes according to arbitrary sets of design principles. Here we describe a synthetic yeast genome project, Sc2.0, and the first partially synthetic eukaryotic chromosomes, Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome synIXR, and semi-synVIL. We defined three design principles for a synthetic genome as follows: first, it should result in a (near) wild-type phenotype and fitness; second, it should lack destabilizing elements such as tRNA genes or transposons; and third, it should have genetic flexibility to facilitate future studies. The synthetic genome features several systemic modifications complying with the design principles, including an inducible evolution system, SCRaMbLE (synthetic chromosome rearrangement and modification by loxP-mediated evolution). We show the utility of SCRaMbLE as a novel method of combinatorial mutagenesis, capable of generating complex genotypes and a broad variety of phenotypes. When complete, the fully synthetic genome will allow massive restructuring of the yeast genome, and may open the door to a new type of combinatorial genetics based entirely on variations in gene content and copy number.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional Characterization of the S. cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis
Winzeler, E. A., Shoemaker, D. D., Astromoff, A., Liang, H., Anderson, K., Andre, B., Bangham, R., Benito, R., Boeke, J. D., Bussey, H., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5429.901 · Cited by 3,953
Self-citation
Cited by
Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand
Ort, D. R., Merchant, S. S., Alric, J., Barkan, A., Blankenship, R. E., Bock, R., Croce, R., Hanson, M. R., Hibberd, J. M., Long, S. P., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1424031112 · Cited by 1,020
A brief history of synthetic biology
Cameron, D. E., Bashor, C. J., & Collins, J. J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3239 · Cited by 933
Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications
Kosuri, S., & Church, G. M. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2918 · Cited by 869
Directed Evolution: Methodologies and Applications
Wang, Y., Xue, P., Cao, M., Yu, T., Lane, S. T., & Zhao, H. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00260 · Cited by 719
j5 DNA Assembly Design Automation Software
Hillson, N. J., Rosengarten, R. D., & Keasling, J. D. (2012) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb2000116 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Dymond, J. S., Richardson, S. M., Coombes, C. E., Babatz, T., Muller, H., Annaluru, N., Blake, W. J., Schwerzmann, J. W., Dai, J., Lindstrom, D. L., Boeke, A. C., Gottschling, D. E., Chandrasegaran, S., Bader, J. S., & Boeke, J. D.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 477
- Issue
- 7365
- Pages
- 471-476
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2131559925
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10403
- The paper
- Dymond, J. S., Richardson, S. M., Coombes, C. E., Babatz, T., Muller, H., Annaluru, N., Blake, W. J., Schwerzmann, J. W., Dai, J., Lindstrom, D. L., Boeke, A. C., Gottschling, D. E., Chandrasegaran, S., Bader, J. S., & Boeke, J. D. (2011). Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.