The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits
Open accessAbstract
The Toffoli gate is a three-quantum-bit (three-qubit) operation that inverts the state of a target qubit conditioned on the state of two control qubits. It makes universal reversible classical computation possible and, together with a Hadamard gate, forms a universal set of gates in quantum computation. It is also a key element in quantum error correction schemes. The Toffoli gate has been implemented in nuclear magnetic resonance, linear optics and ion trap systems. Experiments with superconducting qubits have also shown significant progress recently: two-qubit algorithms and two-qubit process tomography have been implemented, three-qubit entangled states have been prepared, first steps towards quantum teleportation have been taken and work on quantum computing architectures has been done. Implementation of the Toffoli gate with only single- and two-qubit gates requires six controlled-NOT gates and ten single-qubit operations, and has not been realized in any system owing to current limits on coherence. Here we implement a Toffoli gate with three superconducting transmon qubits coupled to a microwave resonator. By exploiting the third energy level of the transmon qubits, we have significantly reduced the number of elementary gates needed for the implementation of the Toffoli gate, relative to that required in theoretical proposals using only two-level systems. Using full process tomography and Monte Carlo process certification, we completely characterize the Toffoli gate acting on three independent qubits, measuring a fidelity of 68.5 ± 0.5 per cent. A similar approach to realizing characteristic features of a Toffoli-class gate has been demonstrated with two qubits and a resonator and achieved a limited characterization considering only the phase fidelity. Our results reinforce the potential of macroscopic superconducting qubits for the implementation of complex quantum operations with the possibility of quantum error correction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311
Toffoli, T. (1980) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-10003-2_104 · Cited by 1,523
Experimental Quantum Error Correction
Cory, D. G., Price, M. D., Maas, W., Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Zurek, W. H., Havel, T. F., & Somaroo, S. S. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.2152 · Cited by 581
Realization of quantum error correction
Chiaverini, J., Leibfried, D., Schaetz, T., Barrett, M. D., Blakestad, R. B., Britton, J., Itano, W. M., Jost, J. D., Knill, E., Langer, C., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03074 · Cited by 517
Direct Fidelity Estimation from Few Pauli Measurements
Flammia, S. T., & Liu, Y.-K. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.230501 · Cited by 449
Both Toffoli and Controlled-NOT need little help to universal quantum computing
Shi, Y.-Y. (2003) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic3.1-7 · Cited by 193
Quantum error correction beyond qubits
Aoki, T., Takahashi, G., Kajiya, T., Yoshikawa, J.-I., Braunstein, S. L., van Loock, P., & Furusawa, A. (2009) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys1309 · Cited by 144
Quantum-control approach to realizing a Toffoli gate in circuit QED
Stojanović, V. M., Fedorov, A., Wallraff, A., & Bruder, C. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.054504 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Cited by
Parallel Implementation of High-Fidelity Multiqubit Gates with Neutral Atoms
Levine, H., Keesling, A., Semeghini, G., Omran, A., Wang, T. T., Ebadi, S., Bernien, H., Greiner, M., Vuletić, V., Pichler, H., et al. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.170503 · Cited by 604
Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits
Morgado, M., & Whitlock, S. (2021) · AVS Quantum Science · doi:10.1116/5.0036562 · Cited by 370
Exponential Error Suppression for Near-Term Quantum Devices
Koczor, B. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031057 · Cited by 147
Asymptotic improvements to quantum circuits via qutrits
Gokhale, P., Baker, J. M., Duckering, C., Brown, N. C., Brown, K. R., & Chong, F. T. (2019) · Proceedings of the 46th International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/3307650.3322253 · Cited by 120
High-Contrast Qubit Interactions Using Multimode Cavity QED
McKay, D. C., Naik, R., Reinhold, P., Bishop, L. S., & Schuster, D. I. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.080501 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Fedorov, A., Steffen, L., Baur, M., da Silva, M. P., & Wallraff, A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2011-12-14
- Volume
- 481
- Issue
- 7380
- Pages
- 170-172
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2102864190
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10713
- The paper
- Fedorov, A., Steffen, L., Baur, M., da Silva, M. P., & Wallraff, A. (2012). Implementation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10713
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.