The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming
Open accessAbstract
Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by somatic cell reprogramming involves global epigenetic remodelling. Whereas several proteins are known to regulate chromatin marks associated with the distinct epigenetic states of cells before and after reprogramming, the role of specific chromatin-modifying enzymes in reprogramming remains to be determined. To address how chromatin-modifying proteins influence reprogramming, we used short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) to target genes in DNA and histone methylation pathways, and identified positive and negative modulators of iPSC generation. Whereas inhibition of the core components of the polycomb repressive complex 1 and 2, including the histone 3 lysine 27 methyltransferase EZH2, reduced reprogramming efficiency, suppression of SUV39H1, YY1 and DOT1L enhanced reprogramming. Specifically, inhibition of the H3K79 histone methyltransferase DOT1L by shRNA or a small molecule accelerated reprogramming, significantly increased the yield of iPSC colonies, and substituted for KLF4 and c-Myc (also known as MYC). Inhibition of DOT1L early in the reprogramming process is associated with a marked increase in two alternative factors, NANOG and LIN28, which play essential functional roles in the enhancement of reprogramming. Genome-wide analysis of H3K79me2 distribution revealed that fibroblast-specific genes associated with the epithelial to mesenchymal transition lose H3K79me2 in the initial phases of reprogramming. DOT1L inhibition facilitates the loss of this mark from genes that are fated to be repressed in the pluripotent state. These findings implicate specific chromatin-modifying enzymes as barriers to or facilitators of reprogramming, and demonstrate how modulation of chromatin-modifying enzymes can be exploited to more efficiently generate iPSCs with fewer exogenous transcription factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells
Yu, J., Vodyanik, M. A., Smuga-Otto, K., Antosiewicz-Bourget, J., Frane, J. L., Tian, S., Nie, J., Jonsdottir, G. A., Ruotti, V., Stewart, R., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151526 · Cited by 10,310
Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells
Mikkelsen, T. S., Ku, M., Jaffe, D. B., Issac, B., Lieberman, E., Giannoukos, G., Alvarez, P., Brockman, W., Kim, T.-K., Koche, R. P., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06008 · Cited by 4,129
Self-citationThe Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life
Margueron, R., & Reinberg, D. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09784 · Cited by 3,347
Cited by
Epigenetic plasticity and the hallmarks of cancer
Flavahan, W. A., Gaskell, E., & Bernstein, B. E. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal2380 · Cited by 1,340
MDM2, MDMX and p53 in oncogenesis and cancer therapy
Wade, M., Li, Y.-C., & Wahl, G. M. (2013) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3430 · Cited by 1,279
Senescence-associated reprogramming promotes cancer stemness
Milanovic, M., Fan, D. N. Y., Belenki, D., Däbritz, J. H. M., Zhao, Z., Yu, Y., Dörr, J. R., Dimitrova, L., Lenze, D., Monteiro Barbosa, I. A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25167 · Cited by 1,131
Soufi, A., Donahue, G., & Zaret, K. S. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045 · Cited by 933
Simon, J. A., & Kingston, R. E. (2013) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.013 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Onder, T. T., Kara, N., Cherry, A., Sinha, A. U., Zhu, N., Bernt, K. M., Cahan, P., Mancarci, B. O., Unternaehrer, J., Gupta, P. B., Lander, E. S., Armstrong, S. A., & Daley, G. Q.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 483
- Issue
- 7391
- Pages
- 598-602
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2147284744
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10953
- The paper
- Onder, T. T., Kara, N., Cherry, A., Sinha, A. U., Zhu, N., Bernt, K. M., Cahan, P., Mancarci, B. O., Unternaehrer, J., Gupta, P. B., Lander, E. S., Armstrong, S. A., & Daley, G. Q. (2012). Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.