Cited by 642Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Superflares on solar-type stars

Maehara, Hiroyuki, Shibayama, Takuya, Notsu, Shota, Notsu, Yuta, Nagao, Takashi, Kusaba, Satoshi, Honda, Satoshi, Nogami, Daisaku +1 more·2012·Nature

Abstract

Solar flares are caused by the sudden release of magnetic energy stored near sunspots. They release 10(29) to 10(32) ergs of energy on a timescale of hours. Similar flares have been observed on many stars, with larger 'superflares' seen on a variety of stars, some of which are rapidly rotating and some of which are of ordinary solar type. The small number of superflares observed on solar-type stars has hitherto precluded a detailed study of them. Here we report observations of 365 superflares, including some from slowly rotating solar-type stars, from about 83,000 stars observed over 120 days. Quasi-periodic brightness modulations observed in the solar-type stars suggest that they have much larger starspots than does the Sun. The maximum energy of the flare is not correlated with the stellar rotation period, but the data suggest that superflares occur more frequently on rapidly rotating stars. It has been proposed that hot Jupiters may be important in the generation of superflares on solar-type stars, but none have been discovered around the stars that we have studied, indicating that hot Jupiters associated with superflares are rare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature11063

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maehara, H., Shibayama, T., Notsu, S., Notsu, Y., Nagao, T., Kusaba, S., Honda, S., Nogami, D., & Shibata, K.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Maehara, Hiroyuki
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-05
Volume
485
Issue
7399
Pages
478-481
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1988363137
Cited by
642
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Space Telescope Science Institute
  • Science Mission Directorate
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23740150)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
superflares, solar-type stars, stellar flares, stellar rotation, stellar spots, hot Jupiters, flare frequency, stellar magnetic activity, flare energy, stellar magnetic fields, flare energy distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review