The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice
Open accessAbstract
Genetic recombination occurs during meiosis, the key developmental programme of gametogenesis. Recombination in mammals has been recently linked to the activity of a histone H3 methyltransferase, PR domain containing 9 (PRDM9), the product of the only known speciation-associated gene in mammals. PRDM9 is thought to determine the preferred recombination sites--recombination hotspots--through sequence-specific binding of its highly polymorphic multi-Zn-finger domain. Nevertheless, Prdm9 knockout mice are proficient at initiating recombination. Here we map and analyse the genome-wide distribution of recombination initiation sites in Prdm9 knockout mice and in two mouse strains with different Prdm9 alleles and their F(1) hybrid. We show that PRDM9 determines the positions of practically all hotspots in the mouse genome, with the exception of the pseudo-autosomal region (PAR)--the only area of the genome that undergoes recombination in 100% of cells. Surprisingly, hotspots are still observed in Prdm9 knockout mice, and as in wild type, these hotspots are found at H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) trimethylation marks. However, in the absence of PRDM9, most recombination is initiated at promoters and at other sites of PRDM9-independent H3K4 trimethylation. Such sites are rarely targeted in wild-type mice, indicating an unexpected role of the PRDM9 protein in sequestering the recombination machinery away from gene-promoter regions and other functional genomic elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prdm9 knockout mice demonstrate abnormal location of recombination hotspots with enrichment at gene promoters and enhancers, and also fail to properly repair double-stranded breaks and are infertile (both sexes sterile)(21, 22).”
From Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386
Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types
Ernst, J., Kheradpour, P., Mikkelsen, T. S., Shoresh, N., Ward, L. D., Epstein, C. B., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Issner, R., Coyne, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09906 · Cited by 2,898
A Chromatin Landmark and Transcription Initiation at Most Promoters in Human Cells
Guenther, M. G., Levine, S. S., Boyer, L. A., Jaenisch, R., & Young, R. A. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.042 · Cited by 2,002
Tan, M., Luo, H., Lee, S., Jin, F., Yang, J. S., Montellier, E., Buchou, T., Cheng, Z., Rousseaux, S., Rajagopal, N., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.008 · Cited by 1,902
PRDM9 Is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Humans and Mice
Baudat, F., Buard, J., Grey, C., Fledel-Alon, A., Ober, C., Przeworski, M., Coop, G., & de Massy, B. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1183439 · Cited by 1,026
Drive Against Hotspot Motifs in Primates Implicates the PRDM9 Gene in Meiotic Recombination
Myers, S., Bowden, R., Tumian, A., Bontrop, R. E., Freeman, C., MacFie, T. S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182363 · Cited by 683
Krüppel-associated boxes are potent transcriptional repression domains.
Margolin, J., Friedman, J. R., Meyer, W. K.-H., Vissing, H., Thiesen, H., & Rauscher, F. J. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.10.4509 · Cited by 619
Prdm9 Controls Activation of Mammalian Recombination Hotspots
Parvanov, E. D., Petkov, P. M., & Paigen, K. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181495 · Cited by 610
Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data
Jothi, R., Cuddapah, S., Barski, A., Cui, K., & Zhao, K. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn488 · Cited by 539
Pan, J., Sasaki, M., Kniewel, R., Murakami, H., Blitzblau, H. G., Tischfield, S. E., Zhu, X., Neale, M. J., Jasin, M., Socci, N. D., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.009 · Cited by 531
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 415
Structural Variation Shapes the Landscape of Recombination in Mouse
Morgan, A. P., Gatti, D. M., Najarian, M. L., Keane, T., Galante, R. J., Pack, A. I., Mott, R., Churchill, G. A., & de Villena, F. P. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.116.197988 · Cited by 61
Huang, Y., Li, L., An, G., Yang, X., Cui, M., Song, X., Lin, J., Zhang, X., Yao, Z., Wan, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01232-7 · Cited by 59
Prdm9 Polymorphism Unveils Mouse Evolutionary Tracks
Kono, H., Tamura, M., Osada, N., Suzuki, H., Abe, K., Moriwaki, K., Ohta, K., & Shiroishi, T. (2014) · DNA Research · doi:10.1093/dnares/dst059 · Cited by 62
Kaiser, V., & Semple, C. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1483-4 · Cited by 52
Zhang, J., Gurusaran, M., Fujiwara, Y., Zhang, K., Echbarthi, M., Vorontsov, E. A., Guo, R., Pendlebury, D. F., Alam, I., Livera, G., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15954-x · Cited by 62
Structural basis for human PRDM9 action at recombination hot spotsPreprint
Patel, A. B., Horton, J. R., Wilson, G. G., Zhang, X., & Cheng, X. (2016) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.274928.115 · Cited by 58
Patterns of recombination in snakes reveal a tug-of-war between PRDM9 and promoter-like features
Hoge, C., de Manuel, M., Mahgoub, M., Okami, N., Fuller, Z. L., Banerjee, S. M., Baker, Z., McNulty, M., Andolfatto, P., Macfarlan, T. S., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adj7026 · Cited by 57
Demirci, S., van Dijk, A. D. J., Sanchez‐Perez, G. F., Aflitos, S. A., de Ridder, D., & Peters, S. (2017) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13406 · Cited by 57
Sex Differences in Recombination in Sticklebacks
Sardell, J. M., Cheng, C., Dagilis, A. J., Ishikawa, A., Kitano, J., Peichel, C. L., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2018) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.118.200166 · Cited by 56
Genomic and chromatin features shaping meiotic double-strand break formation and repair in mice
Yamada, S., Kim, S., Tischfield, S. E., Jasin, M., Lange, J., & Keeney, S. (2017) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2017.1361065 · Cited by 61
Huang, T., Yuan, S., Gao, L., Li, M., Yu, X., Zhan, J., Yin, Y., Liu, C., Zhang, C., Lü, G., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53459 · Cited by 62
Multimer Formation Explains Allelic Suppression of PRDM9 Recombination Hotspots
Baker, C. L., Petkova, P., Walker, M., Flachs, P., Mihola, O., Trachtulec, Z., Petkov, P. M., & Paigen, K. (2015) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005512 · Cited by 54
De novo deletions and duplications at recombination hotspots in mouse germlines
Lukaszewicz, A., Lange, J., Keeney, S., & Jasin, M. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.025 · Cited by 54
Cell-type-specific genomics reveals histone modification dynamics in mammalian meiosis
Lam, K.-W. G., Brick, K., Cheng, G., Pratto, F., & Camerini‐Otero, R. D. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11820-7 · Cited by 50
Self-citationBaier, B. S., Hunt, P. A., Broman, K. W., & Hassold, T. J. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004125 · Cited by 51
Historical Meiotic Crossover Hotspots Fueled Patterns of Evolutionary Divergence in Rice
Marand, A. P., Zhao, H., Zhang, W., Zeng, Z., Fang, C. Q., & Jiang, J. (2019) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.18.00750 · Cited by 55
Menon, D. U., Shibata, Y., Mu, W., & Magnuson, T. (2019) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.174094 · Cited by 53
Székvölgyi, L., Ohta, K., & Nicolas, A. G. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016527 · Cited by 56
Topological Data Analysis Generates High-Resolution, Genome-wide Maps of Human Recombination
Cámara, P. G., Rosenbloom, D. I. S., Emmett, K., Levine, A. J., & Rabadán, R. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.05.008 · Cited by 50
PRDM9 losses in vertebrates are coupled to those of paralogs ZCWPW1 and ZCWPW2
Cavassim, M. I. A., Baker, Z., Hoge, C., Schierup, M. H., Schumer, M. E., & Przeworski, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2114401119 · Cited by 50
Bhattacharyya, T., Walker, M., Powers, N. R., Brunton, C., Fine, A. D., Petkov, P. M., & Handel, M. A. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.007 · Cited by 55
Darde, T., Sallou, O., Becker, E., Evrard, B., Monjeaud, C., Bras, Y. L., Jégou, B., Collin, O., Rolland, A. D., & Chalmel, F. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv345 · Cited by 47
Serra, H., Choi, K., Zhao, X., Blackwell, A. R., Kim, J., & Henderson, I. R. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007843 · Cited by 49
Zhu, X., & Keeney, S. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.178293 · Cited by 48
Genetic control of meiosis surveillance mechanisms in mammals
Huang, Y., & Roig, I. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1127440 · Cited by 47
Strong Artificial Selection in Domestic Mammals Did Not Result in an Increased Recombination Rate
Muñoz‐Fuentes, V., Marcet-Ortega, M., Alkorta‐Aranburu, G., Forsberg, C. L., Morrell, J. M., Manzano-Piedras, E., Söderberg, A., Daniel, K., Villalba, A., Tóth, A., et al. (2014) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu322 · Cited by 47
Recombination regulator PRDM9 influences the instability of its own coding sequence in humans
Jeffreys, A. J., Cotton, V. E., Neumann, R., & Lam, K.-W. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1220813110 · Cited by 51
Adam, C., Guérois, R., Citarella, A., Verardi, L., Adolphe, F., Béneut, C., Sommermeyer, V., Ramus, C., Govin, J., Couté, Y., et al. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007223 · Cited by 51
Dual histone methyl reader ZCWPW1 facilitates repair of meiotic double strand breaks in male mice
Mahgoub, M., Paiano, J., Bruno, M., Wu, W., Pathuri, S., Zhang, X., Ralls, S., Cheng, X., Nussenzweig, A., & Macfarlan, T. S. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.53360 · Cited by 53
Histone methyltransferase PRDM9 is not essential for meiosis in male micePreprint
Mihola, O., Pratto, F., Brick, K., Linhartova, E., Kobets, T., Flachs, P., Baker, C. L., Sedláček, R., Paigen, K., Petkov, P. M., et al. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.244426.118 · Cited by 53
Self-citationCapilla, L., Medarde, N., Alemany‐Schmidt, A., Oliver‐Bonet, M., Ventura, J., & Ruiz‐Herrera, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0297 · Cited by 44
Meiotic Recombination Strongly Influences GC-Content Evolution in Short Regions in the Mouse Genome
Clément, Y., & Arndt, P. F. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst154 · Cited by 43
Control of meiotic double-strand-break formation by ATM: local and global views
Lukaszewicz, A., Lange, J., Keeney, S., & Jasin, M. (2018) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.1080/15384101.2018.1464847 · Cited by 44
TOPOVIBL-REC114 interaction regulates meiotic DNA double-strand breaks
Nore, A., Juarez-Martinez, A. B., Clément, J., Brun, C., Diagouraga, B., Laroussi, H., Grey, C., Bourbon, H. M., Kadlec, J., Robert, T., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34799-0 · Cited by 43
Alleva, B., Brick, K., Pratto, F., Huang, M., & Camerini‐Otero, R. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.675286 · Cited by 45
Self-citationAlexander, A. K., Rice, E. J., Lujić, J., Simon, L. E., Tanis, S., Barshad, G., Zhu, L., Lama, J., Cohen, P. E., & Danko, C. G. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37408-w · Cited by 42
Twisted Signatures of GC-Biased Gene Conversion Embedded in an Evolutionary Stable Karyotype
Mugal, C. F., Arndt, P. F., & Ellegren, H. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst067 · Cited by 42
Lim, M., Witt, C. C., Graham, C. H., & Dávalos, L. M. (2019) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evz101 · Cited by 44
Regulation of Meiotic Prophase One in Mammalian Oocytes
Wang, X., & Pepling, M. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.667306 · Cited by 41
Aberrant PRDM9 expression impacts the pan-cancer genomic landscapePreprint
Houle, A. A., Gibling, H., Lamaze, F. C., Edgington, H. A., Soave, D. M., Favé, M.-J., Agbessi, M. D. T., Bruat, V., Stein, L. D., & Awadalla, P. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.231696.117 · Cited by 41
The Red Queen model of recombination hot-spot evolution: a theoretical investigation
Latrille, T., Duret, L., & Lartillot, N. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0463 · Cited by 40
Understanding the factors that shape patterns of nucleotide diversity in the house mouse genome
Booker, T. R., & Keightley, P. D. (2018) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msy188 · Cited by 44
Flachs, P., Bhattacharyya, T., Mihola, O., Piálek, J., Forejt, J., & Trachtulec, Z. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095806 · Cited by 39
The impact of recombination on human mutation load and disease
Alves, I., Houle, A. A., Hussin, J., & Awadalla, P. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0465 · Cited by 37
Heterogeneous transposable elements as silencers, enhancers and targets of meiotic recombination
Underwood, C. J., & Choi, K. (2019) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-019-00718-4 · Cited by 40
Contrasted patterns in mating-type chromosomes in fungi: Hotspots versus coldspots of recombination
Idnurm, A., Hood, M. E., Johannesson, H., & Giraud, T. (2015) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2015.06.001 · Cited by 39
PRDM9 activity depends on HELLS and promotes local 5-hydroxymethylcytosine enrichment
Imai, Y., Biot, M., Clément, J. A. J., Teragaki, M., Urbach, S., Robert, T., Baudat, F., Grey, C., & de Massy, B. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57117 · Cited by 39
de Boer, E., Jasin, M., & Keeney, S. (2015) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.265561.115 · Cited by 38
Chromosomal Instability in Genome Evolution: From Cancer to Macroevolution
Comaills, V., & Castellano‐Pozo, M. (2023) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology12050671 · Cited by 40
Plant Tolerance to Drought Stress with Emphasis on Wheat
Adel, S., & Carels, N. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12112170 · Cited by 40
Epigenetic control of meiotic recombination in plants
Yelina, N. E., Diaz, P., Lambing, C., & Henderson, I. R. (2015) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-015-4811-x · Cited by 46
Reconstitution of SPO11-dependent double-strand break formation
Zheng, Z., Zheng, L., Arter, M., Liu, K., Yamada, S., Ontoso, D., Kim, S., & Keeney, S. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08601-2 · Cited by 40
Modification of meiotic recombination by natural variation in plants
Lawrence, E. J., Griffin, C., & Henderson, I. R. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx306 · Cited by 38
The Recombination Landscape in Wild House Mice Inferred Using Population Genomic Data
Booker, T. R., Ness, R. W., & Keightley, P. D. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.117.300063 · Cited by 36
Gao, J., Kim, H., Elia, A. E. H., Elledge, S. J., & Colaiácovo, M. P. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005029 · Cited by 38
Liu, H., & Nonomura, K. (2016) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.184937 · Cited by 35
Where to Cross Over? Defining Crossover Sites in Plants
Dluzewska, J., Szymańska-Lejman, M., & Ziółkowski, P. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00609 · Cited by 42
RAD51AP2 is required for efficient meiotic recombination between X and Y chromosomes
Ma, H., Li, T., Xie, X., Jiang, L., Ye, J., Gong, C., Jiang, H., Fan, S., Zhang, H., Shi, B., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk1789 · Cited by 33
Coupling DNA Damage and Repair: an Essential Safeguard during Programmed DNA Double-Strand Breaks?
Bétermier, M., Borde, V., & de Villartay, J. (2019) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2019.11.005 · Cited by 37
Bascón-Cardozo, K., Bours, A., Manthey, G., Durieux, G., Dutheil, J. Y., Pruisscher, P., Odenthal-Hesse, L., & Liedvogel, M. (2024) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evad233 · Cited by 34
Initiation of meiotic recombination in chromatin structure
Yamada, T., & Ohta, K. (2013) · The Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1093/jb/mvt054 · Cited by 35
Koh, X., Joy, J. K., Poulsen, A., Li, R., Tan, Y. T. F., Shim, Y., Min, J., Wu, L., Ngo, A., Peng, J., et al. (2014) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20140374 · Cited by 34
Wang, Y., Guo, T., Ke, H., Zhang, Q., Li, S., Luo, W., & Qin, Y. (2021) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01266-y · Cited by 33
Ito, M., Furukohri, A., Matsuzaki, K., Fujita, Y., Toyoda, A., & Shinohara, A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42576-w · Cited by 32
The Role of Chromatin Modifications in Progression through Mouse Meiotic Prophase
Crichton, J. H., Playfoot, C. J., & Adams, I. R. (2014) · Journal of genetics and genomics/Journal of Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2014.01.003 · Cited by 33
Legoff, L., Dali, O., D’Cruz, S. C., Suglia, A., Gély-Pernot, A., Hémery, C., Kernanec, P.-Y., Demmouche, A. E., Kervarrec, C., Tevosian, S. G., et al. (2019) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-019-0276-7 · Cited by 33
Self-citationPrinciples of chromosome organization for meiotic recombination
Biot, M., Tóth, A., Brun, C., Guichard, L., de Massy, B., & Grey, C. (2024) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2024.04.001 · Cited by 32
The histone variant H2A.Z promotes initiation of meiotic recombination in fission yeast
Yamada, S., Kugou, K., Ding, D., Fujita, Y., Hiraoka, Y., Murakami, H., Ohta, K., & Yamada, T. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1110 · Cited by 32
Meiotic Genes and DNA Double Strand Break Repair in Cancer
Lingg, L., Rottenberg, S., & Francica, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.831620 · Cited by 32
Ismail, M. B., Shinohara, M., & Shinohara, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096648 · Cited by 31
Tex19.1 promotes Spo11-dependent meiotic recombination in mouse spermatocytes
Crichton, J. H., Playfoot, C. J., MacLennan, M., Read, D., Cooke, H. J., & Adams, I. R. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006904 · Cited by 30
Accurate annotation of accessible chromatin in mouse and human primordial germ cells
Li, J., Shen, S., Chen, J., Liu, W., Li, X., Zhu, Q., Wang, B., Chen, X., Wu, L., Wang, M., et al. (2018) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-018-0096-5 · Cited by 28
Transcription-associated events affecting genomic integrity
Sebastian, R., & Oberdoerffer, P. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0288 · Cited by 28
The consequences of sequence erosion in the evolution of recombination hotspots
Tiemann‐Boege, I., Schwarz, T., Striedner, Y., & Lahnsteiner, A. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0462 · Cited by 29
Diverse roles for CDK‐associated activity during spermatogenesis
Palmer, N., Talib, S. Z. A., & Kaldis, P. (2019) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13627 · Cited by 30
Yuan, S., Huang, T., Bao, Z., Wang, S., Wu, X., Liu, J., Liu, H., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02758-z · Cited by 28
Mammalian Meiotic Recombination: A Toolbox for Genome Evolution
Capilla, L., Garcia-Caldés, M., & Ruiz‐Herrera, A. (2016) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000452822 · Cited by 32
DNA Motifs Are Not General Predictors of Recombination in Two Drosophila Sister Species
Howie, J. M., Mazzucco, R., Taus, T., Nolte, V., & Schlötterer, C. (2019) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evz082 · Cited by 28
Rat PRDM9 shapes recombination landscapes, duration of meiosis, gametogenesis, and age of fertility
Mihola, O., Landa, V., Pratto, F., Brick, K., Kobets, T., Kusari, F., Gasic, S., Smagulova, F. O., Grey, C., Flachs, P., et al. (2021) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-021-01017-0 · Cited by 28
Self-citationEnhancer Runaway and the Evolution of Diploid Gene Expression
Fyon, F., Cailleau, A., & Lenormand, T. (2015) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005665 · Cited by 30
Detecting Recombination Hotspots from Patterns of Linkage Disequilibrium
Wall, J. D., & Stevison, L. S. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.029587 · Cited by 28
Germline Methylation Patterns Determine the Distribution of Recombination Events in the Dog Genome
Berglund, J., Quilez, J., Arndt, P. F., & Webster, M. T. (2014) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evu282 · Cited by 25
Capilla, L., Sánchez‐Guillén, R. A., Farré, M., Paytuví-Gallart, A., Malinverni, R., Ventura, J., Larkin, D., & Ruiz‐Herrera, A. (2016) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evw276 · Cited by 28
MORC2B is essential for meiotic progression and fertility
Shi, B., Xue, J., Zhou, J. P., Kasowitz, S. D., Zhang, Y., Liang, G., Guan, Y., Shi, Q., Liu, M., Sha, J., et al. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007175 · Cited by 25
Analysis of Meiotic Double-Strand Break Initiation in Mammals
Brick, K., Pratto, F., Sun, C., Camerini‐Otero, R. D., & Petukhova, G. (2018) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2017.11.037 · Cited by 24
Self-citationTian, H., Billings, T., & Petkov, P. M. (2018) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007657 · Cited by 29
Storey, A. J., Wang, H.-P., Protacio, R. U., Davidson, M. K., Tackett, A. J., & Wahls, W. P. (2018) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-018-0233-x · Cited by 26
Dynamic changes in histone lysine lactylation during meiosis prophase I in mouse spermatogenesis
Zhang, X., Liu, Y., & Wang, N. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2418693122 · Cited by 24
Fine-Scale Crossover Rate Variation on the Caenorhabditis elegans X Chromosome
Bernstein, M. R., & Rockman, M. V. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.116.028001 · Cited by 24
Yoon, S., Choi, E.-H., Kim, J.-W., & Kim, K. P. (2018) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-018-0139-5 · Cited by 25
Down the Penrose stairs, or how selection for fewer recombination hotspots maintains their existence
Baker, Z., Przeworski, M., & Sella, G. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.83769 · Cited by 23
High prevalence of PRDM9-independent recombination hotspots in placental mammals
Joseph, J., Prentout, D., Laverré, A., Tricou, T., & Duret, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2401973121 · Cited by 23
New paradigms for conserved, multifactorial, cis-acting regulation of meiotic recombination
Wahls, W. P., & Davidson, M. K. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks761 · Cited by 23
Evolutionary dynamics of meiotic recombination hotspots regulator PRDM9 in bovids
Ahlawat, S., De, S., Sharma, P., Sharma, R., Arora, R., Kataria, R. S., Datta, T. K., & Singh, R. K. (2016) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-016-1260-6 · Cited by 25
Functional Roles of Acetylated Histone Marks at Mouse Meiotic Recombination Hot Spots
Getun, I. V., Wu, Z., Fallahi, M., Ouizem, S., Liu, Q., Li, W., Costi, R., Roush, W. R., Cleveland, J. L., & Bois, P. R. J. (2016) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00942-15 · Cited by 21
Instability of the Pseudoautosomal Boundary in House Mice
Morgan, A. P., Bell, T. A., Crowley, J. J., & de Villena, F. P. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302232 · Cited by 22
Schwarzkopf, E. J., Motamayor, J. C., & Cornejo, O. E. (2020) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-020-6746-2 · Cited by 24
Reduced meiotic recombination in rhesus macaques and the origin of the human recombination landscape
Xue, C., Rustagi, N., Liu, X., Raveendran, M., Harris, R. A., Venkata, M. G., Rogers, J., & Yu, F. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236285 · Cited by 19
Interrogating the Functions of PRDM9 Domains in Meiosis
Thibault-Sennett, S., Yu, Q., Smagulova, F. O., Cloutier, J. M., Brick, K., Camerini‐Otero, R. D., & Petukhova, G. V. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.118.300565 · Cited by 26
Self-citationGenetic architecture of individual variation in recombination rate on the X chromosome in cattle
Zhang, J., Kadri, N. K., Mullaart, E., Spelman, R. J., Fritz, S., Boichard, D., Charlier, C., Georges, M., & Druet, T. (2020) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-020-0341-9 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Brick, K., Smagulova, F., Khil, P., Camerini-Otero, R. D., & Petukhova, G. V.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US)
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Petukhova, Galina V.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 485
- Issue
- 7400
- Pages
- 642-645
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3367396
- OpenAlex
- W2024459631
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084104)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- PRDM9, meiotic recombination, recombination hotspots, H3K4 trimethylation, promoter targeting, meiosis
- MeSH terms
- Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Histones, Meiosis, Methylation, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Recombination, Genetic, Genome, Mice, Knockout, Mice, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review