Cited by 1,026Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic VariationsDNA Repair Mechanisms

PRDM9 Is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Humans and Mice

Open access
Baudat, F., Buard, J., Grey, C., Fledel-Alon, A., Ober, C., Przeworski, M., Coop, G., de Massy, B.·2010·Science

Abstract

Homing in on Hotspots: The clustering of recombination in the genome, around locations known as hotspots, is associated with specific DNA motifs. Now, using a variety of techniques, three studies implicate a chromatin-modifying protein, the histone-methyltransferase PRDM9, as a major factor involved in human hotspots (see the Perspective by Cheung et al. ). Parvanov et al. (p. 835 , published online 31 December) mapped the locus in mice, and analyzed allelic variation in mice and humans, whereas Myers et al. (p. 876 , published online 31 December) used a comparative analysis between human and chimpanzees to show that the recombination process leads to a self-destructive drive in which the very motifs that recruit hotspots are eliminated from our genome. Baudat et al. (p. 836 , published online 31 December) took this analysis a step further to identify human allelic variants within Prdm9 that differed in the frequency at which they used hotspots. Furthermore, differential binding of this protein to different human alleles suggests that this protein interacts with specific DNA sequences. Thus, PDRM9 functions in the determination of recombination loci within the genome and may be a significant factor in the genomic differences between closely related species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1183439

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using DSB maps and a maximum likelihood model, only 5.9% (2 log unit CI 0-24%) of observed PRDM9 knockout duo maternal gamete crossovers matched DSB sites from wild type PRDM9-A allele homozygotes.

    “Using double strand break (DSB) maps and a maximum likelihood model to account for variability in region size and hotspot density(18), we estimated that only 5.9% (2 log unit confidence interval: 0 - 24%) of the observed PRDM9 knockout duo maternal gamete crossovers matched DSB sites from wild type PRDM9-A allele homozygotes(5).”
  • PRDM9 is the major known determinant of the genomic locations of meiotic recombination events in humans and mice through its DNA binding site zinc finger domain.

    “PRDM9 is the major known determinant of the genomic locations of meiotic recombination events in humans and mice through its DNA binding site zinc finger domain (6, 18, 19).”
  • 18.5% of crossovers in the PRDM9 knockout duo (CI 1%-42%) occurred in linkage disequilibrium based hotspots versus 75.7% in the control duo (CI 57%-89%).

    “Using similar methods we saw that 18.5% of crossovers observed in the PRDM9 knockout duo (confidence interval: 1% - 42%) occurred in linkage disequilibrium based hotspots versus 75.7% in the control duo (confidence interval 57%-89% consistent with a previously published estimate of an average of 60% of crossovers occurring at hotspots(18))(5).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Hunter N Molecular genetics of recombination Aguilera A Rothstein R Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007 381 442

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baudat, F., Buard, J., Grey, C., Fledel-Alon, A., Ober, C., Przeworski, M., Coop, G., & de Massy, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Institut de Génétique Humaine, UPR1142, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Corresponding author
  • Baudat, F.
  • Buard, J.
  • Grey, C.
Venue
Science
Published
2010-02-12
Volume
327
Issue
5967
Pages
836-840
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2047657819
Cited by
1,026
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 87
FWCI
27.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BLAN-0269)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL085197, R01HL085197)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM083098, GM83098)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021244, HD21244)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
PRDM9, meiotic recombination hotspots, histone methyltransferase, DNA sequence motifs, chromatin modification, allelic variation, human-chimpanzee comparison, protein-DNA interactions, meiosis
MeSH terms
Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Genotype, Humans, Meiosis, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Molecular Sequence Data, Phenotype, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Recombination, Genetic, Genome, Human, Zinc Fingers, Genome, Mice, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review