Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A single low-energy, iron-poor supernova as the source of metals in the star SMSS J031300.36−670839.3

Open access
Keller, S. C., Bessell, M. S., Frebel, A., Casey, A. R., Asplund, M., Jacobson, H. R., Lind, K., Norris, J. E., Yong, D., Heger, A., Magic, Z., Da Costa, G. S., Schmidt, B. P., Tisserand, P.·2014·Nature

Abstract

The element abundance ratios of four low-mass stars with extremely low metallicities (abundances of elements heavier than helium) indicate that the gas out of which the stars formed was enriched in each case by at most a few—and potentially only one—low-energy supernova. Such supernovae yield large quantities of light elements such as carbon but very little iron. The dominance of low-energy supernovae seems surprising, because it had been expected that the first stars were extremely massive, and that they disintegrated in pair-instability explosions that would rapidly enrich galaxies in iron. What has remained unclear is the yield of iron from the first supernovae, because hitherto no star has been unambiguously interpreted as encapsulating the yield of a single supernova. Here we report the optical spectrum of SMSS J031300.36−670839.3, which shows no evidence of iron (with an upper limit of 10−7.1 times solar abundance). Based on a comparison of its abundance pattern with those of models, we conclude that the star was seeded with material from a single supernova with an original mass about 60 times that of the Sun (and that the supernova left behind a black hole). Taken together with the four previously mentioned low-metallicity stars, we conclude that low-energy supernovae were common in the early Universe, and that such supernovae yielded light-element enrichment with insignificant iron. Reduced stellar feedback both chemically and mechanically from low-energy supernovae would have enabled first-generation stars to form over an extended period. We speculate that such stars may perhaps have had an important role in the epoch of cosmic reionization and the chemical evolution of early galaxies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12990

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Keller, S. C., Bessell, M. S., Frebel, A., Casey, A. R., Asplund, M., Jacobson, H. R., Lind, K., Norris, J. E., Yong, D., Heger, A., Magic, Z., Da Costa, G. S., Schmidt, B. P., & Tisserand, P.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-02
Volume
506
Issue
7489
Pages
463-466
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2018133573
Cited by
379
References
31
FWCI
27.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A single low-energy, iron-poor supernova as the source of metals in the star SMSS J031300.36−670839.3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature12990
The paper
Keller, S. C., Bessell, M. S., Frebel, A., Casey, A. R., Asplund, M., Jacobson, H. R., Lind, K., Norris, J. E., Yong, D., Heger, A., Magic, Z., Da Costa, G. S., Schmidt, B. P., & Tisserand, P. (2014). A single low-energy, iron-poor supernova as the source of metals in the star SMSS J031300.36−670839.3. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12990

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.