Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,669

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III

Open access
Heger, A., Woosley, S. E.·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Growing evidence suggests that the first generation of stars may have been quite massive (~100-300 M ☉ ). Could these stars have left a distinct nucleosynthetic signature? We explore the nucleosynthesis of helium cores in the mass range M He = 64-133 M ☉ , corresponding to main-sequence star masses of approximately 140-260 M ☉ . Above M He = 133 M ☉ , without rotation and using current reaction rates, a black hole is formed, and no nucleosynthesis is ejected. For lighter helium core masses, ~40-63 M ☉ , violent pulsations occur, induced by the pair instability and accompanied by supernova-like mass ejection, but the star eventually produces a large iron core in hydrostatic equilibrium. It is likely that this core, too, collapses to a black hole, thus cleanly separating the heavy-element nucleosynthesis of pair instability supernovae from those of other masses, both above and below. Indeed, black hole formation is a likely outcome for all Population III stars with main-sequence masses between about 25 and 140 M ☉ ( M He = 9-63 M ☉ ) as well as those above 260 M ☉ . Nucleosynthesis in pair instability supernovae varies greatly with the mass of the helium core. This core determines the maximum temperature reached during the bounce. At the upper range of exploding core masses, a maximum of 57 M ☉ of 56 Ni is produced, making these the most energetic and the brightest thermonuclear explosions in the universe. Integrating over a distribution of masses, we find that pair instability supernovae produce a roughly solar distribution of nuclei having even nuclear charge (Si, S, Ar, etc.) but are remarkably deficient in producing elements with odd nuclear charge—Na, Al, P, V, Mn, etc. This is because there is no stage of stable post-helium burning to set the neutron excess. Also, essentially no elements heavier than zinc are produced owing to a lack of s - and r -processes. The Fe/Si ratio is quite sensitive to whether the upper bound on the initial mass function is over 260 M ☉ or somewhere between 140 and 260 M ☉ . When the yields of pair instability supernovae are combined with reasonable estimates of the nucleosynthesis of Population III stars from 12 to 40 M ☉ , this distinctive pattern of deficient production of odd- Z elements persists. Some possible strategies for testing our predictions are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/338487

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,669

Metadata

Authors
Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-03
Volume
567
Issue
1
Pages
532-543
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1983471014
Cited by
1,669
References
1
FWCI
40.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338487
The paper
Heger, A., & Woosley, S. E. (2002). The Nucleosynthetic Signature of Population III. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/338487

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.