The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum imaging with undetected photons
Open accessAbstract
Information is central to quantum mechanics. In particular, quantum interference occurs only if there exists no information to distinguish between the superposed states. The mere possibility of obtaining information that could distinguish between overlapping states inhibits quantum interference. Here we introduce and experimentally demonstrate a quantum imaging concept based on induced coherence without induced emission. Our experiment uses two separate down-conversion nonlinear crystals (numbered NL1 and NL2), each illuminated by the same pump laser, creating one pair of photons (denoted idler and signal). If the photon pair is created in NL1, one photon (the idler) passes through the object to be imaged and is overlapped with the idler amplitude created in NL2, its source thus being undefined. Interference of the signal amplitudes coming from the two crystals then reveals the image of the object. The photons that pass through the imaged object (idler photons from NL1) are never detected, while we obtain images exclusively with the signal photons (from NL1 and NL2), which do not interact with the object. Our experiment is fundamentally different from previous quantum imaging techniques, such as interaction-free imaging or ghost imaging, because now the photons used to illuminate the object do not have to be detected at all and no coincidence detection is necessary. This enables the probe wavelength to be chosen in a range for which suitable detectors are not available. To illustrate this, we show images of objects that are either opaque or invisible to the detected photons. Our experiment is a prototype in quantum information—knowledge can be extracted by, and about, a photon that is never detected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum mechanical interaction-free measurements
Elitzur, A. C., & Vaidman, L. (1993) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00736012 · Cited by 673
Cited by
A Survey on quantum computing technology
Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2019) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002 · Cited by 646
An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical
Padgett, M. J., & Boyd, R. W. (2017) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0233 · Cited by 282
Roadmap on quantum light spectroscopy
Mukamel, S., Freyberger, M., Schleich, W., Bellini, M., Zavatta, A., Leuchs, G., Silberhorn, C., Boyd, R. W., Sánchez-Soto, L. L., Stefanov, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6455/ab69a8 · Cited by 178
Nonseparable States of Light: From Quantum to Classical
Shen, Y., & Rosales‐Guzmán, C. (2022) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.202100533 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Lemos, G. B., Borish, V., Cole, G. D., Ramelow, S., Lapkiewicz, R., & Zeilinger, A.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 512
- Issue
- 7515
- Pages
- 409-412
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W4235475088
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum imaging with undetected photons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature13586
- The paper
- Lemos, G. B., Borish, V., Cole, G. D., Ramelow, S., Lapkiewicz, R., & Zeilinger, A. (2014). Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13586
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.