The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical
Open accessAbstract
Ghost imaging has been a subject of interest to the quantum optics community for the past 20 years. Initially seen as manifestation of quantum spookiness, it is now recognized as being implementable in both single- and many-photon number regimes. Beyond its scientific curiosity, it is now feeding novel imaging modalities potentially offering performance attributes that traditional approaches cannot match. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Quantum technology for the 21st century’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 · Cited by 16,654
Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling
Duarte, M. F., Davenport, M. A., Takhar, D., Laska, J. N., Sun, T., Kelly, K. F., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2007.914730 · Cited by 3,575
Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement
Pittman, T. B., Shih, Y. H., Strekalov, D. V., & Sergienko, A. V. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.r3429 · Cited by 2,142
Shapiro, J. H. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.061802 · Cited by 1,531
“Two-Photon” Coincidence Imaging with a Classical Source
Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J., & Boyd, R. W. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.113601 · Cited by 1,113
Self-citationGhost Imaging with Thermal Light: Comparing Entanglement and ClassicalCorrelation
Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M., & Lugiato, L. A. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.093602 · Cited by 930
3D Computational Imaging with Single-Pixel Detectors
Sun, B., Edgar, M., Bowman, R. W., Vittert, L., Welsh, S. S., BOWMAN, A. W., & Padgett, M. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234454 · Cited by 914
Self-citationObservation of Two-Photon “Ghost” Interference and Diffraction
Strekalov, D. V., Sergienko, A. V., Klyshko, D. N., & Shih, Y. H. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.3600 · Cited by 889
Two-Photon Imaging with Thermal Light
Valencia, A., Scarcelli, G., D’Angelo, M., & Shih, Y. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.063601 · Cited by 838
Quantum imaging with undetected photons
Lemos, G. B., Borish, V., Cole, G. D., Ramelow, S., Lapkiewicz, R., & Zeilinger, A. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13586 · Cited by 758
Cited by
Motazedifard, A., Madani, S. A., Dashkasan, J. J., & Vayaghan, N. S. (2021) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07384 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Padgett, M. J., & Boyd, R. W.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2017-06-26
- Volume
- 375
- Issue
- 2099
- Pages
- 20160233
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W2715660703
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsta.2016.0233
- The paper
- Padgett, M. J., & Boyd, R. W. (2017). An introduction to ghost imaging: quantum and classical. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
