Cited by 296Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsHIV Research and TreatmentEnzyme Structure and Function

Structure of the immature HIV-1 capsid in intact virus particles at 8.8 Å resolution

Schur, Florian K. M., Hagen, Wim J. H., Rumlová, Michaela, Ruml, Tomáš, Müller, Barbara, Kräusslich, Hans-Georg, Briggs, John A. G.·2015·Nature

Abstract

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) assembly proceeds in two stages. First, the 55 kilodalton viral Gag polyprotein assembles into a hexameric protein lattice at the plasma membrane of the infected cell, inducing budding and release of an immature particle. Second, Gag is cleaved by the viral protease, leading to internal rearrangement of the virus into the mature, infectious form. Immature and mature HIV-1 particles are heterogeneous in size and morphology, preventing high-resolution analysis of their protein arrangement in situ by conventional structural biology methods. Here we apply cryo-electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging methods to resolve the structure of the capsid lattice within intact immature HIV-1 particles at subnanometre resolution, allowing unambiguous positioning of all α-helices. The resulting model reveals tertiary and quaternary structural interactions that mediate HIV-1 assembly. Strikingly, these interactions differ from those predicted by the current model based on in vitro-assembled arrays of Gag-derived proteins from Mason-Pfizer monkey virus. To validate this difference, we solve the structure of the capsid lattice within intact immature Mason-Pfizer monkey virus particles. Comparison with the immature HIV-1 structure reveals that retroviral capsid proteins, while having conserved tertiary structures, adopt different quaternary arrangements during virus assembly. The approach demonstrated here should be applicable to determine structures of other proteins at subnanometre resolution within heterogeneous environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature13838

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although previous low-resolution structures showed a similar immature lattice spacing of 80 A and suggested a conserved CA-NTD arrangement, the arrangement of the CA-NTD domains was different in all three viruses when observed at higher resolution.

    “Unexpectedly, although previous low-resolution structures had showed a similar immature lattice spacing of 80 A ˚ and suggested a conserved CA-NTD arrangement [33,34], the arrangement of the CA-NTD domains was in fact different in all three viruses when observed at higher-resolution.”
  • Comparison of capsid quaternary arrangements found in all three viruses revealed that it is conserved for the CA-CTD domains.

    “Comparison of capsid quaternary arrangements found in all three viruses revealed that it is conserved for the CA-CTD domains”
  • Intra-hexameric interactions were formed by the top of helix 4 and the region spanning helix 5 and 6 in the adjacent monomer.

    “Intra-hexameric interactions were formed by the top of helix 4 and the region spanning helix 5 and 6 in the adjacent monomer.”
  • Inter-hexameric CA-NTD contacts involved homo-dimeric and homo-trimeric interfaces in helices 1 and 2, respectively.

    “Inter-hexameric CA-NTD contacts involved homo-dimeric and homo-trimeric interfaces in helices 1 and 2, respectively.”
  • The arrangement of the CA-NTD is not conserved between retroviruses, while that of the CA-CTD is largely conserved.

    “Firstly, as described above, the arrangement of the CA-NTD is not conserved between retroviruses, while that of the CA-CTD is largely conserved”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schur, F. K. M., Hagen, W. J. H., Rumlová, M., Ruml, T., Müller, B., Kräusslich, H.-G., & Briggs, J. A. G.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague (CZ)
Corresponding author
Briggs, John A. G.
Venue
Nature
Published
2014-11-02
Volume
517
Issue
7535
Pages
505-508
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2087978946
Cited by
296
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 50
FWCI
21.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ASEP (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
HIV-1, immature virus particles, capsid lattice, capsid protein structure, Gag protein, viral assembly, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, cryo-electron tomography, subtomogram averaging, in situ structural analysis
MeSH terms
Capsid, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Virion, HIV-1, Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, Virus Assembly, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Capsid Proteins, Electron Microscope Tomography, Protein Multimerization, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review