The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds
Open accessAbstract
In human societies, cultural norms arise when behaviours are transmitted through social networks via high-fidelity social learning. However, a paucity of experimental studies has meant that there is no comparable understanding of the process by which socially transmitted behaviours might spread and persist in animal populations. Here we show experimental evidence of the establishment of foraging traditions in a wild bird population. We introduced alternative novel foraging techniques into replicated wild sub-populations of great tits (Parus major) and used automated tracking to map the diffusion, establishment and long-term persistence of the seeded innovations. Furthermore, we used social network analysis to examine the social factors that influenced diffusion dynamics. From only two trained birds in each sub-population, the information spread rapidly through social network ties, to reach an average of 75% of individuals, with a total of 414 knowledgeable individuals performing 57,909 solutions over all replicates. The sub-populations were heavily biased towards using the technique that was originally introduced, resulting in established local traditions that were stable over two generations, despite a high population turnover. Finally, we demonstrate a strong effect of social conformity, with individuals disproportionately adopting the most frequent local variant when first acquiring an innovation, and continuing to favour social information over personal information. Cultural conformity is thought to be a key factor in the evolution of complex culture in humans. In providing the first experimental demonstration of conformity in a wild non-primate, and of cultural norms in foraging techniques in any wild animal, our results suggest a much broader taxonomic occurrence of such an apparently complex cultural behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Gluesing, J. C. (2012) · Leadership in Science and Technology: A Reference Handbook · doi:10.4135/9781412994231.n14 · Cited by 3,210
Laland, K. N. (2004) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03196002 · Cited by 1,551
Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees
Whiten, A., Horner, V., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04047 · Cited by 788
Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis
Whitehead, H. (2008) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226895246.001.0001 · Cited by 756
Social Learning in Animals: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models
GALEF, B. G., & LALAND, K. N. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0489:sliaes]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 652
Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5619 · Cited by 601
Potent Social Learning and Conformity Shape a Wild Primate’s Foraging Decisions
van de Waal, E., Borgeaud, C., & Whiten, A. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232769 · Cited by 568
On the relation between social dynamics and social learning
Coussi-Korbel, S., & Fragaszy, D. M. (1995) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80001-8 · Cited by 559
Cited by
The ecology of human fear: survival optimization and the nervous system
Mobbs, D., Hagan, C. C., Dalgleish, T., Silston, B., & Prévost, C. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00055 · Cited by 498
Cultural evolutionary theory: How culture evolves and why it matters
Creanza, N., Kolodny, O., & Feldman, M. W. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620732114 · Cited by 482
Gopnik, A., O’Grady, S., Lucas, C. G., Griffiths, T. L., Wente, A., Bridgers, S., Aboody, R., Fung, H., & Dahl, R. E. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1700811114 · Cited by 328
Childhood as a solution to explore–exploit tensions
Gopnik, A. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0502 · Cited by 319
A framework for studying social complexity
Kappeler, P. M. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-018-2601-8 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Aplin, L. M., Farine, D. R., Morand-Ferron, J., Cockburn, A., Thornton, A., & Sheldon, B. C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2014-12-03
- Volume
- 518
- Issue
- 7540
- Pages
- 538-541
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1982707930
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 677.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature13998
- The paper
- Aplin, L. M., Farine, D. R., Morand-Ferron, J., Cockburn, A., Thornton, A., & Sheldon, B. C. (2015). Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.