The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis
Abstract
Animals lead rich social lives. They care for one another, compete for resources, and mate. Within a society, social relationships may be simple or complex and usually vary considerably, both between different groups of individuals and over time. These social systems are fundamental to biological organization, and animal societies are central to studies of behavioral and evolutionary biology. But, how do we study animal societies? How do we take observations of animals fighting, grooming, or forming groups and produce a realistic description or model of their societies?Analyzing Animal Societies presents a conceptual framework for analyzing social behavior and demonstrates how to put this framework into practice by collecting suitable data on the interactions and associations of individuals so that relationships can be described, and, from these, models can be derived. In addition to presenting the tools, Hal Whitehead illustrates their applicability using a wide range of real data on a variety of animal species - from bats and chimps to dolphins and birds. The techniques that Whitehead describes will be profitably adopted by scientists working with primates, cetaceans, birds, and ungulates, but the tools can be used to study societies of invertebrates, amphibians, and even humans.Analyzing Animal Societies will become a standard reference for those studying vertebrate social behavior and will give to these studies the kind of quality standard already in use in other areas of the life sciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers.
Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10736 · Cited by 698
Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams
Psorakis, I., Roberts, S. J., Rezek, I., & Sheldon, B. C. (2012) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0223 · Cited by 171
The interplay between social networks and culture: theoretically and among whales and dolphins
Cantor, M., & Whitehead, H. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0340 · Cited by 149
Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society
Hobson, E. A., & DeDeo, S. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004411 · Cited by 85
Instability Rules Social Groups in the Communal Breeder Rodent Octodon degus
Ebensperger, L. A., Chesh, A. S., Castro, R. A., Tolhuysen, L. O., Quirici, V., Burger, J. R., & Hayes, L. D. (2009) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01635.x · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 46-5619-46-5619
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W628118418
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.46-5619
- The paper
- Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. (2009). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.46-5619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.