The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The octopus genome and the evolution of cephalopod neural and morphological novelties
Open accessAbstract
Octopus bimaculoides genome and transcriptome sequencing demonstrated that a core gene repertoire broadly similar to that of other invertebrate bilaterians is accompanied by expansions in the protocadherin and C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factor families and large-scale genome rearrangements closely associated with octopus-specific transposable elements. Octopuses have been called 'the most intelligent invertebrate', with a host of complex behaviours, and a nervous system comparable in size to that of mammals but organized in a very different manner. It had been hypothesized that, as in vertebrates, whole-genome duplication contributed to the evolution of this complex nervous system. Caroline Albertin et al. have sequenced the genome and multiple transcriptomes of the California two-spot octopus (Octopus bimaculoides) and find no evidence for such duplications but there are large-scale genome rearrangements closely associated with octopus-specific transposable elements. The core developmental and neuronal gene repertoire turns out to be broadly similar to that of other invertebrates, apart from expansions in two gene families formerly thought to be uniquely expanded in vertebrates — the protocadherins (cell-adhesion molecules that regulate neural development) and the C2H2 superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors. Coleoid cephalopods (octopus, squid and cuttlefish) are active, resourceful predators with a rich behavioural repertoire1. They have the largest nervous systems among the invertebrates2 and present other striking morphological innovations including camera-like eyes, prehensile arms, a highly derived early embryogenesis and a remarkably sophisticated adaptive colouration system1,3. To investigate the molecular bases of cephalopod brain and body innovations, we sequenced the genome and multiple transcriptomes of the California two-spot octopus, Octopus bimaculoides. We found no evidence for hypothesized whole-genome duplications in the octopus lineage4,5,6. The core developmental and neuronal gene repertoire of the octopus is broadly similar to that found across invertebrate bilaterians, except for massive expansions in two gene families previously thought to be uniquely enlarged in vertebrates: the protocadherins, which regulate neuronal development, and the C2H2 superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors. Extensive messenger RNA editing generates transcript and protein diversity in genes involved in neural excitability, as previously described7, as well as in genes participating in a broad range of other cellular functions. We identified hundreds of cephalopod-specific genes, many of which showed elevated expression levels in such specialized structures as the skin, the suckers and the nervous system. Finally, we found evidence for large-scale genomic rearrangements that are closely associated with transposable element expansions. Our analysis suggests that substantial expansion of a handful of gene families, along with extensive remodelling of genome linkage and repetitive content, played a critical role in the evolution of cephalopod morphological innovations, including their large and complex nervous systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437
MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., & Ronquist, F. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · Cited by 21,937
Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome
Grabherr, M. G., Haas, B. J., Yassour, M., Levin, J. Z., Thompson, D. A., Amit, I., Adiconis, X., Fan, L., Raychowdhury, R., Zeng, Q., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1883 · Cited by 21,039
Fast, scalable generation of high‐quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega
Sievers, F., Wilm, A., Dineen, D., Gibson, T. J., Karplus, K., Li, W., Lopez, R., McWilliam, H., Remmert, M., Söding, J., et al. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.75 · Cited by 15,355
FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · Cited by 14,894
Trapnell, C., Roberts, A., Goff, L., Pertea, G., Kim, D., Kelley, D. R., Pimentel, H., Salzberg, S. L., Rinn, J. L., & Pachter, L. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.016 · Cited by 12,116
TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq
Trapnell, C., Pachter, L., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 · Cited by 11,617
Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench
Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M. A., Clamp, M., & Barton, G. J. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 · Cited by 10,235
Cited by
Adaptation to deep-sea chemosynthetic environments as revealed by mussel genomes
Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Xu, T., Zhang, Y., Mu, H., Zhang, Y., Lan, Y., Fields, C. J., Hui, J. H. L., Zhang, W., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0121 · Cited by 359
Trade-off between transcriptome plasticity and genome evolution in cephalopods
Liscovitch-Brauer, N., Alon, S., Porath, H. T., Elstein, B., Unger, R., Ziv, T., Admon, A., Levanon, E. Y., Rosenthal, J. J. C., & Eisenberg, E. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.025 · Cited by 356
Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail
Adema, C. M., Hillier, L. W., Jones, C. S., Loker, E. S., Knight, M., Minx, P., Oliveira, G., Raghavan, N., Shedlock, A., do Amaral, L. R., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms15451 · Cited by 292
Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes
Simakov, O., Bredeson, J., Berkoff, K., Marletaz, F., Mitros, T., Schultz, D. T., O’Connell, B. L., Dear, P., Martinez, D. E., Steele, R. E., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi5884 · Cited by 197
Self-citationProtocadherins at the Crossroad of Signaling Pathways
Pancho, A., Aerts, T., Mitsogiannis, M. D., & Seuntjens, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2020.00117 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Albertin, C. B., Simakov, O., Mitros, T., Wang, Z. Y., Pungor, J. R., Edsinger-Gonzales, E., Brenner, S., Ragsdale, C. W., & Rokhsar, D. S.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 524
- Issue
- 7564
- Pages
- 220-224
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W1537776120
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 63.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The octopus genome and the evolution of cephalopod neural and morphological novelties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature14668
- The paper
- Albertin, C. B., Simakov, O., Mitros, T., Wang, Z. Y., Pungor, J. R., Edsinger-Gonzales, E., Brenner, S., Ragsdale, C. W., & Rokhsar, D. S. (2015). The octopus genome and the evolution of cephalopod neural and morphological novelties. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.