The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate
Open accessAbstract
In real-time quantum feedback protocols, the record of a continuous measurement is used to stabilize a desired quantum state. Recent years have seen successful applications of these protocols in a variety of well-isolated micro-systems, including microwave photons and superconducting qubits. However, stabilizing the quantum state of a tangibly massive object, such as a mechanical oscillator, remains very challenging: the main obstacle is environmental decoherence, which places stringent requirements on the timescale in which the state must be measured. Here we describe a position sensor that is capable of resolving the zero-point motion of a solid-state, 4.3-megahertz nanomechanical oscillator in the timescale of its thermal decoherence, a basic requirement for real-time (Markovian) quantum feedback control tasks, such as ground-state preparation. The sensor is based on evanescent optomechanical coupling to a high-Q microcavity, and achieves an imprecision four orders of magnitude below that at the standard quantum limit for a weak continuous position measurement—a 100-fold improvement over previous reports—while maintaining an imprecision–back-action product that is within a factor of five of the Heisenberg uncertainty limit. As a demonstration of its utility, we use the measurement as an error signal with which to feedback cool the oscillator. Using radiation pressure as an actuator, the oscillator is cold damped with high efficiency: from a cryogenic-bath temperature of 4.4 kelvin to an effective value of 1.1 ± 0.1 millikelvin, corresponding to a mean phonon number of 5.3 ± 0.6 (that is, a ground-state probability of 16 per cent). Our results set a new benchmark for the performance of a linear position sensor, and signal the emergence of mechanical oscillators as practical subjects for measurement-based quantum control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state
Chan, J., Alegre, T. P. M., Safavi-Naeini, A. H., Hill, J. T., Krause, A., Gröblacher, S., Aspelmeyer, M., & Painter, O. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10461 · Cited by 2,311
Cited by
Balram, K. C., Davanço, M. I., Song, J. D., & Srinivasan, K. (2016) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.46 · Cited by 360
Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Ground-state cooling of mechanical resonators by quantum reservoir engineering
Naseem, M. T., & Müstecaplıoğlu, Ö. E. (2021) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00599-z · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, D. J., Sudhir, V., Piro, N., Schilling, R., Ghadimi, A., & Kippenberg, T. J.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 524
- Issue
- 7565
- Pages
- 325-329
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2124572694
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature14672
- The paper
- Wilson, D. J., Sudhir, V., Piro, N., Schilling, R., Ghadimi, A., & Kippenberg, T. J. (2015). Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.