Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,068

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse

Open access
Landau, Dan A., Tausch, Eugen, Taylor-Weiner, Amaro N., Stewart, Chip, Reiter, Johannes G., Bahlo, Jasmin, Kluth, Sandra, Bozic, Ivana, Lawrence, Mike, Böttcher, Sebastian, Carter, Scott L., Cibulskis, Kristian, Mertens, Daniel, Sougnez, Carrie L., Rosenberg, Mara, Hess, Julian M., Edelmann, Jennifer, Kless, Sabrina, Kneba, Michael, Ritgen, Matthias, Fink, Anna, Fischer, Kirsten, Gabriel, Stacey, Lander, Eric S., Nowak, Martin A., Döhner, Hartmut, Hallek, Michael, Neuberg, Donna, Getz, Gad, Stilgenbauer, Stephan, Wu, Catherine J.·2015·Nature

Abstract

Which genetic alterations drive tumorigenesis and how they evolve over the course of disease and therapy are central questions in cancer biology. Here we identify 44 recurrently mutated genes and 11 recurrent somatic copy number variations through whole-exome sequencing of 538 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and matched germline DNA samples, 278 of which were collected in a prospective clinical trial. These include previously unrecognized putative cancer drivers (RPS15, IKZF3), and collectively identify RNA processing and export, MYC activity, and MAPK signalling as central pathways involved in CLL. Clonality analysis of this large data set further enabled reconstruction of temporal relationships between driver events. Direct comparison between matched pre-treatment and relapse samples from 59 patients demonstrated highly frequent clonal evolution. Thus, large sequencing data sets of clinically informative samples enable the discovery of novel genes associated with cancer, the network of relationships between the driver events, and their impact on disease relapse and clinical outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature15395

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,068

Metadata

Authors
Landau, D. A., Tausch, E., Taylor-Weiner, A. N., Stewart, C., Reiter, J. G., Bahlo, J., Kluth, S., Bozic, I., Lawrence, M., Böttcher, S., Carter, S. L., Cibulskis, K., Mertens, D., Sougnez, C. L., Rosenberg, M., Hess, J. M., Edelmann, J., Kless, S., Kneba, M., Ritgen, M., Fink, A., Fischer, K., Gabriel, S., Lander, E. S., Nowak, M. A., Döhner, H., Hallek, M., Neuberg, D., Getz, G., Stilgenbauer, S., & Wu, C. J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2015-10
Volume
526
Issue
7574
Pages
525-530
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2136272158
Cited by
1,068
References
5
FWCI
52.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature15395
The paper
Landau, D. A., Tausch, E., Taylor-Weiner, A. N., Stewart, C., Reiter, J. G., Bahlo, J., Kluth, S., Bozic, I., Lawrence, M., Böttcher, S., Carter, S. L., Cibulskis, K., Mertens, D., Sougnez, C. L., Rosenberg, M., Hess, J. M., Edelmann, J., Kless, S., Kneba, M., . . . Wu, C. J. (2015). Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15395

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.