The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Traumatic injury to the brain or spinal cord is one of the most serious public health problems worldwide. The devastating impact of 'trauma', a term used to define the global burden of disease related to all injuries, is the leading cause of loss of human potential across the globe, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Enormous challenges must be met to significantly advance neurotrauma research around the world, specifically in underserved and austere environments. Neurotrauma research at the global level needs to be contextualized: different regions have their own needs and obstacles. Interventions that are not considered a priority in some regions could be a priority for others. The introduction of inexpensive and innovative interventions, including mobile technologies and e-health applications, focused on policy management improvement are essential and should be applicable to the needs of the local environment. The simple transfer of a clinical question from resource-rich environments to those of low- and middle-income countries that lack sophisticated interventions may not be the best strategy to address these countries' needs. Emphasis on promoting the design of true 'ecological' studies that include the evaluation of human factors in relation to the process of care, analytical descriptions of health systems, and how leadership is best applied in medical communities and society as a whole will become crucial.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical trials in head injury
Narayan, R. K., Michel, M. E., Ansell, B., Baethmann, A., Biegon, A., Bracken, M. B., Bullock, M. R., Choi, S. C., Clifton, G. L., Contant, C. F., et al. (2002) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/089771502753754037 · Cited by 913
Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: past experience and current developments
Maas, A. I. R., Roozenbeek, B., & Manley, G. T. (2010) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2009.10.022 · Cited by 291
Cited by
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell, M. J., Belli, A., Bragge, P., Brazinova, A., Büki, A., Chesnut, R. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30371-x · Cited by 2,609
Self-citationTraumatic spinal injury: global epidemiology and worldwide volume
Kumar, R., Lim, J., Mekary, R. A., Rattani, A., Dewan, M. C., Sharif, S. Y., Osorio-Fonseca, E., & Park, K. B. (2018) · World Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.033 · Cited by 657
NADPH oxidase in brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders
Ma, M. W., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, R., Dhandapani, K. M., Vadlamudi, R. K., & Brann, D. W. (2017) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-017-0150-7 · Cited by 432
Li, L., Zhang, Y., Mu, J., Chen, J., Zhang, C., Cao, H., & Gao, J. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00929 · Cited by 404
Sun, G., Li, G., Li, D., Huang, W., Zhang, R., Zhang, H., Duan, Y., & Wang, B. (2018) · Materials Science and Engineering C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.006 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubiano, A. M., Carney, N., Chesnut, R., & Puyana, J. C.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 527
- Issue
- 7578
- Pages
- S193-S197
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2173352997
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature16035
- The paper
- Rubiano, A. M., Carney, N., Chesnut, R., & Puyana, J. C. (2015). Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.