Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 942

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection

Open access
Moyes, David L., Wilson, Duncan, Richardson, Jonathan P., Mogavero, Selene, Tang, Shirley X., Wernecke, Julia, Höfs, Sarah, Gratacap, Remi L., Robbins, Jon, Runglall, Manohursingh, Murciano, Celia, Blagojevic, Mariana, Thavaraj, Selvam, Förster, Toni M., Hebecker, Betty, Kasper, Lydia, Vizcay, Gema, Iancu, Simona I., Kichik, Nessim, Häder, Antje, Kurzai, Oliver, Luo, Ting, Krüger, Thomas, Kniemeyer, Olaf, Cota, Ernesto, Bader, Oliver, Wheeler, Robert T., Gutsmann, Thomas, Hube, Bernhard, Naglik, Julian R.·2016·Nature

Abstract

Cytolytic proteins and peptide toxins are classical virulence factors of several bacterial pathogens which disrupt epithelial barrier function, damage cells and activate or modulate host immune responses. Such toxins have not been identified previously in human pathogenic fungi. Here we identify the first, to our knowledge, fungal cytolytic peptide toxin in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. This secreted toxin directly damages epithelial membranes, triggers a danger response signalling pathway and activates epithelial immunity. Membrane permeabilization is enhanced by a positive charge at the carboxy terminus of the peptide, which triggers an inward current concomitant with calcium influx. C. albicans strains lacking this toxin do not activate or damage epithelial cells and are avirulent in animal models of mucosal infection. We propose the name ‘Candidalysin’ for this cytolytic peptide toxin; a newly identified, critical molecular determinant of epithelial damage and host recognition of the clinically important fungus, C. albicans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature17625

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 942

Metadata

Authors
Moyes, D. L., Wilson, D., Richardson, J. P., Mogavero, S., Tang, S. X., Wernecke, J., Höfs, S., Gratacap, R. L., Robbins, J., Runglall, M., Murciano, C., Blagojevic, M., Thavaraj, S., Förster, T. M., Hebecker, B., Kasper, L., Vizcay, G., Iancu, S. I., Kichik, N., Häder, A., Kurzai, O., Luo, T., Krüger, T., Kniemeyer, O., Cota, E., Bader, O., Wheeler, R. T., Gutsmann, T., Hube, B., & Naglik, J. R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-03-30
Volume
532
Issue
7597
Pages
64-68
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2329943654
Cited by
942
References
8
FWCI
66.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.