Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The gene cortex controls mimicry and crypsis in butterflies and moths

Open access
Nadeau, Nicola J., Pardo-Diaz, Carolina, Whibley, Annabel, Supple, Megan A., Saenko, Suzanne V., Wallbank, Richard W. R., Wu, Grace C., Maroja, Luana, Ferguson, Laura, Hanly, Joseph J., Hines, Heather, Salazar, Camilo, Merrill, Richard M., Dowling, Andrea J., ffrench-Constant, Richard H., Llaurens, Violaine, Joron, Mathieu, McMillan, W. Owen, Jiggins, Chris D.·2016·Nature

Abstract

Abstract A major challenge in evolutionary biology is to understand the origins of novel structures. The wing patterns of butterflies and moths are derived phenotypes unique to the Lepidoptera. Here we identify a gene that we name poikilomousa ( poik ), which regulates colour pattern switches in the mimetic Heliconius butterflies. Strong associations between phenotypic variation and DNA sequence variation are seen in three different Heliconius species, in addition to associations between gene expression and colour pattern. Colour pattern variants are also associated with differences in splicing of poik transcripts. poik is a member of the conserved fizzy family of cell cycle regulators. It belongs to a faster evolving subfamily, the closest functionally characterised orthologue being the cortex gene in Drosophila, a female germ-line specific protein involved in meiosis. poik appears to have adopted a novel function in the Lepidoptera and become a major target for natural selection acting on colour and pattern variation in this group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature17961

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Nadeau, N. J., Pardo-Diaz, C., Whibley, A., Supple, M. A., Saenko, S. V., Wallbank, R. W. R., Wu, G. C., Maroja, L., Ferguson, L., Hanly, J. J., Hines, H., Salazar, C., Merrill, R. M., Dowling, A. J., ffrench-Constant, R. H., Llaurens, V., Joron, M., McMillan, W. O., & Jiggins, C. D.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
534
Issue
7605
Pages
106-110
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2413031428
Cited by
264
References
72
FWCI
21.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The gene cortex controls mimicry and crypsis in butterflies and moths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature17961
The paper
Nadeau, N. J., Pardo-Diaz, C., Whibley, A., Supple, M. A., Saenko, S. V., Wallbank, R. W. R., Wu, G. C., Maroja, L., Ferguson, L., Hanly, J. J., Hines, H., Salazar, C., Merrill, R. M., Dowling, A. J., ffrench-Constant, R. H., Llaurens, V., Joron, M., McMillan, W. O., & Jiggins, C. D. (2016). The gene cortex controls mimicry and crypsis in butterflies and moths. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17961

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.