Cited by 121Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

Sex-specific pruning of neuronal synapses in Caenorhabditis elegans

Open access
Oren-Suissa, Meital, Bayer, Emily A., Hobert, Oliver·2016·Nature

Abstract

Whether and how neurons that are present in both sexes of the same species can differentiate in a sexually dimorphic manner is not well understood. A comparison of the connectomes of the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite and male nervous systems reveals the existence of sexually dimorphic synaptic connections between neurons present in both sexes. Here we demonstrate sex-specific functions of these sex-shared neurons and show that many neurons initially form synapses in a hybrid manner in both the male and hermaphrodite pattern before sexual maturation. Sex-specific synapse pruning then results in the sex-specific maintenance of subsets of these connections. Reversal of the sexual identity of either the pre- or postsynaptic neuron alone transforms the patterns of synaptic connectivity to that of the opposite sex. A dimorphically expressed and phylogenetically conserved transcription factor is both necessary and sufficient to determine sex-specific connectivity patterns. Our studies reveal new insights into sex-specific circuit development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature17977

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Durbin RM Ph.D. thesis 1987 University of Cambridge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oren-Suissa, M., Bayer, E. A., & Hobert, O.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Hobert, Oliver
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-05-04
Volume
533
Issue
7602
Pages
206-211
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2345968315
Cited by
121
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R37NS039996, F31NS096863)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, sexual maturation, sensory neurons, transcription factors, connectome, sex-specific behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Sensory Receptor Cells, Sex Characteristics, Disorders of Sex Development, Sexual Maturation, Synapses, Transcription Factors, Conserved Sequence, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review