Cited by 335Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchProtein Structure and Dynamics

Allosteric nanobodies reveal the dynamic range and diverse mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor activation

Open access
Staus, Dean P., Strachan, Ryan T., Manglik, Aashish, Pani, Biswaranjan, Kahsai, Alem W., Kim, Tae Hun, Wingler, Laura M., Ahn, Seungkirl +10 more·2016·Nature

Abstract

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate many physiological processes by transducing a variety of extracellular cues into intracellular responses. Ligand binding to an extracellular orthosteric pocket propagates conformational change to the receptor cytosolic region to promote binding and activation of downstream signalling effectors such as G proteins and β-arrestins. It is well known that different agonists can share the same binding pocket but evoke unique receptor conformations leading to a wide range of downstream responses (‘efficacy’). Furthermore, increasing biophysical evidence, primarily using the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) as a model system, supports the existence of multiple active and inactive conformational states. However, how agonists with varying efficacy modulate these receptor states to initiate cellular responses is not well understood. Here we report stabilization of two distinct β2AR conformations using single domain camelid antibodies (nanobodies)—a previously described positive allosteric nanobody (Nb80) and a newly identified negative allosteric nanobody (Nb60). We show that Nb60 stabilizes a previously unappreciated low-affinity receptor state which corresponds to one of two inactive receptor conformations as delineated by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. We find that the agonist isoprenaline has a 15,000-fold higher affinity for β2AR in the presence of Nb80 compared to the affinity of isoprenaline for β2AR in the presence of Nb60, highlighting the full allosteric range of a GPCR. Assessing the binding of 17 ligands of varying efficacy to the β2AR in the absence and presence of Nb60 or Nb80 reveals large ligand-specific effects that can only be explained using an allosteric model which assumes equilibrium amongst at least three receptor states. Agonists generally exert efficacy by stabilizing the active Nb80-stabilized receptor state (R80). In contrast, for a number of partial agonists, both stabilization of R80 and destabilization of the inactive, Nb60-bound state (R60) contribute to their ability to modulate receptor activation. These data demonstrate that ligands can initiate a wide range of cellular responses by differentially stabilizing multiple receptor states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature18636

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The absence of the L chain means that nanobody CDRs are distinct from those of antibodies in both sequence and structure, and as a result nanobodies are able to bind antibody-inaccessible epitopes in enzyme active sites, viral capsids and G protein coupled receptors.

    “The absence of the L chain means that the nanobody’s CDRs are distinct from those of antibodies in both sequence and structure, and as a result nanobodies are able to bind antibody-inaccessible epitopes in enzyme active sites, viral capsids and G protein coupled receptors [233, 234].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staus, D. P., Strachan, R. T., Manglik, A., Pani, B., Kahsai, A. W., Kim, T. H., Wingler, L. M., Ahn, S., Chatterjee, A., Masoudi, A., Kruse, A. C., Pardon, E., Steyaert, J., Weis, W. I., Prosser, R. S., Kobilka, B. K., Costa, T., & Lefkowitz, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kobilka, Brian K.
  • Costa, Tommaso
  • Lefkowitz, Robert J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-07
Volume
535
Issue
7612
Pages
448-452
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2471992026
Cited by
330
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 13
FWCI
25.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Heart Association
  • Ministero della Salute (02351158, RF-201102351158)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 16037, R01HL070631, HL-70631, T32HL007101, R01HL016037)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008294)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007731)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-028471, R01NS028471, R37NS028471)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
beta2-adrenergic receptor, G protein-coupled receptor activation, receptor conformational states, three-state model, partial agonists, full agonists, ligand efficacy, receptor stabilization, orthosteric binding pocket, receptor dynamics
MeSH terms
Allosteric Regulation, Allosteric Site, Humans, Isoproterenol, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2, Crystallography, X-Ray, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular, Drug Partial Agonism, Protein Stability, Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review