Cited by 912Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCancer Cells and Metastasis

A 17-gene stemness score for rapid determination of risk in acute leukaemia

Ng, Stanley W. K., Mitchell, Amanda, Kennedy, James A., Chen, Weihsu C., McLeod, Jessica, Ibrahimova, Narmin, Arruda, Andrea, Popescu, Andreea +22 more·2016·Nature

Abstract

Refractoriness to induction chemotherapy and relapse after achievement of remission are the main obstacles to cure in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). After standard induction chemotherapy, patients are assigned to different post-remission strategies on the basis of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities that broadly define adverse, intermediate and favourable risk categories. However, some patients do not respond to induction therapy and another subset will eventually relapse despite the lack of adverse risk factors. There is an urgent need for better biomarkers to identify these high-risk patients before starting induction chemotherapy, to enable testing of alternative induction strategies in clinical trials. The high rate of relapse in AML has been attributed to the persistence of leukaemia stem cells (LSCs), which possess a number of stem cell properties, including quiescence, that are linked to therapy resistance. Here, to develop predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers related to stemness, we generated a list of genes that are differentially expressed between 138 LSC + and 89 LSC - cell fractions from 78 AML patients validated by xenotransplantation. To extract the core transcriptional components of stemness relevant to clinical outcomes, we performed sparse regression analysis of LSC gene expression against survival in a large training cohort, generating a 17-gene LSC score (LSC17). The LSC17 score was highly prognostic in five independent cohorts comprising patients of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature20598

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 17-gene LSC17 gene set was retrieved from ref. 31.

    “The 17-gene LSC17 gene set was retrieved from ref. 31.”
  • The p53LSC signature performed well as a predictor of survival, including in sAML patients, as compared to the previously published LSC17 score and p53-mutant score generated using all TP53-mutant HSPC rather than LSCs.

    “The p53LSC signature performed well as a predictor of survival, including in sAML patients, as compared to the previously published LSC17 score31 and p53-mutant score generated using all TP53-mutant HSPC rather than LSCs (Extended Data Fig. 6f,g and Supplementary Table 4), providing a powerful tool to aid risk stratification in AML.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, S. W. K., Mitchell, A., Kennedy, J. A., Chen, W. C., McLeod, J., Ibrahimova, N., Arruda, A., Popescu, A., Gupta, V., Schimmer, A. D., Schuh, A. C., Yee, K. W., Bullinger, L., Herold, T., Görlich, D., Büchner, T., Hiddemann, W., Berdel, W. E., Wörmann, B., Cheok, M., Preudhomme, C., Dombret, H., Metzeler, K., Buske, C., Löwenberg, B., Valk, P. J. M., Zandstra, P. W., Minden, M. D., Dick, J. E., & Wang, J. C. Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Centre de Recherche Jean Pierre Aubert (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jean C. Y.
Venue
Nature
Published
2016-12-07
Volume
540
Issue
7633
Pages
433-437
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2560012305
Cited by
912
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 1
FWCI
58.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Hematology Association (TRTH1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, leukemia stem cells, prognostic factors, treatment resistance, relapse, induction chemotherapy response, risk stratification, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, xenotransplantation, sparse regression, survival prediction, minimal residual disease detection
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Female, Humans, Prognosis, Transplantation, Homologous, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Cohort Studies, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Stem Cell Transplantation, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review