Cited by 54Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Atherosclerosis in the single-cell era

Open access
Winkels, Holger, Ehinger, Erik, Ghosheh, Yanal, Wolf, Dennis, Ley, Klaus·2018·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

Purpose of review: The immune system plays a critical role in the development and modulation of atherosclerosis. New high-parameter technologies, including mass cytometry (CyTOF) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), allow for an encompassing analysis of immune cells. Unexplored marker combinations and transcriptomes can define new immune cell subsets and suggest their functions. Here, we review recent advances describing the immune cells in the artery wall of mice with and without atherosclerosis. We compare technologies and discuss limitations and advantages. Recent findings: Both CyTOF and scRNAseq on leukocytes from digested aortae show 10–30 immune cell subsets. Myeloid, T, B and natural killer cells were confirmed. Although cellular functions can be inferred from RNA-Seq data, some subsets cannot be identified based on current knowledge, suggesting they may be new cell types. CyTOF and scRNAseq each identified four B-cell subsets and three macrophage subsets in the atherosclerotic aorta. Limitations include cell death caused by enzymatic digestion and the limited depth of the scRNAseq transcriptomes. Summary: High-parameter methods are powerful tools for uncovering leukocyte diversity. CyTOF is currently more powerful at discerning leukocyte subsets in the atherosclerotic aorta, whereas scRNAseq provides more insight into their likely functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mol.0000000000000537

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winkels, H., Ehinger, E., Ghosheh, Y., Wolf, D., & Ley, K.
Affiliations
La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US)
Corresponding author
Ley, Klaus
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2018-10
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
389-396
ISSN
  • 0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6535
OpenAlex
W2883020052
Cited by
54
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od018499-01)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL121697, R01HL115232, P01HL088093, P01HL136275)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
atherosclerosis, immune cells, aortic atherosclerosis, mass cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, immune cell subsets, B cell subsets, macrophage subsets, myeloid cells, T cells, natural killer cells, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Prognosis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Atherosclerosis, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review