Cited by 173Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Ultra-selective looming detection from radial motion opponency

Open access
Klapoetke, Nathan C., Nern, Aljoscha, Peek, Martin Y., Rogers, Edward M., Breads, Patrick, Rubin, Gerald M., Reiser, Michael B., Card, Gwyneth M.·2017·Nature

Abstract

Nervous systems combine lower-level sensory signals to detect higher-order stimulus features critical to survival, such as the visual looming motion created by an imminent collision or approaching predator. Looming-sensitive neurons have been identified in diverse animal species. Different large-scale visual features such as looming often share local cues, which means loom-detecting neurons face the challenge of rejecting confounding stimuli. Here we report the discovery of an ultra-selective looming detecting neuron, lobula plate/lobula columnar, type II (LPLC2) in Drosophila, and show how its selectivity is established by radial motion opponency. In the fly visual system, directionally selective small-field neurons called T4 and T5 form a spatial map in the lobula plate, where they each terminate in one of four retinotopic layers, such that each layer responds to motion in a different cardinal direction. Single-cell anatomical analysis reveals that each arm of the LPLC2 cross-shaped primary dendrites ramifies in one of these layers and extends along that layer's preferred motion direction. In vivo calcium imaging demonstrates that, as their shape predicts, individual LPLC2 neurons respond strongly to outward motion emanating from the centre of the neuron's receptive field. Each dendritic arm also receives local inhibitory inputs directionally selective for inward motion opposing the excitation. This radial motion opponency generates a balance of excitation and inhibition that makes LPLC2 non-responsive to related patterns of motion such as contraction, wide-field rotation or luminance change. As a population, LPLC2 neurons densely cover visual space and terminate onto the giant fibre descending neurons, which drive the jump muscle motor neuron to trigger an escape take off. Our findings provide a mechanistic description of the selective feature detection that flies use to discern and escape looming threats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature24626

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. [1]Barlow HB Summation and inhibition in the frog’s retina. The Journal of physiology 119, 69– 88 (1953). 13035718 PMC1393035
  2. [2]Lettvin JY, Maturana HR, McCulloch WS & Pitts WH What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the IRE 47, 1940– 1951 (1959).
  3. [3]Hubel DH & Wiesel TN Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. The Journal of physiology 160, 106– 154 (1962). 14449617 PMC1359523
  4. [4]Gibson JJ Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British journal of psychology 49, 182– 194 (1958). 13572790
  5. [5]O’Shea M & Williams J The anatomy and output connection of a locust visual interneurone; the lobular giant movement detector (LGMD) neurone. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 91, 257– 266 (1974).
  6. [6]Wang Y & Frost BJ Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons. Nature 356, 236– 238, doi: 10.1038/356236a0 (1992). 1552942 · DOI
  7. [7]de Vries SE & Clandinin TR Loom-sensitive neurons link computation to action in the Drosophila visual system. Current biology: CB 22, 353– 362, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.007 (2012). 22305754 PMC3298569 · DOI
  8. [9]Peek MY & Card GM Comparative approaches to escape. Current opinion in neurobiology 41, 167– 173, doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.09.012 (2016). 27710794 · DOI
  9. [10]Wu M Visual projection neurons in the Drosophila lobula link feature detection to distinct behavioral programs. eLife 5, doi: 10.7554/eLife.21022 (2016). PMC5293491 28029094 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [11]Maisak MS A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors. Nature 500, 212– 216, doi: 10.1038/nature12320 (2013). 23925246 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [14]von Reyn CR A spike-timing mechanism for action selection. Nature neuroscience 17, 962– 970, doi: 10.1038/nn.3741 (2014). 24908103 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [17]Schilling T & Borst A Local motion detectors are required for the computation of expansion flow-fields. Biology open 4, 1105– 1108, doi: 10.1242/bio.012690 (2015). 26231626 PMC4582123 · DOI
  13. [18]Seelig JD Two-photon calcium imaging from head-fixed Drosophila during optomotor walking behavior. Nature methods 7, 535– 540, doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1468 (2010). 20526346 PMC2945246 · DOI
  14. [19]Chen TW Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295– 300, doi: 10.1038/nature12354 (2013). 23868258 PMC3777791 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [20]Strother JA The Emergence of Directional Selectivity in the Visual Motion Pathway of Drosophila. Neuron 94, 168– 182 e110, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.010 (2017). 28384470 · DOI
  16. [21]Mauss AS Neural Circuit to Integrate Opposing Motions in the Visual Field. Cell 162, 351– 362, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.035 (2015). 26186189 · DOI
  17. [22]Fraser Rowell CH, O’Shea M & Williams JL The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. The Journal of experimental biology 68, 157– 185 (1977). 894184
  18. [23]Ishikane H, Kawana A & Tachibana M Short- and long-range synchronous activities in dimming detectors of the frog retina. Visual neuroscience 16, 1001– 1014 (1999). 10614583
  19. [24]Munch TA Approach sensitivity in the retina processed by a multifunctional neural circuit. Nature neuroscience 12, 1308– 1316, doi: 10.1038/nn.2389 (2009). 19734895 · DOI
  20. [25]Gabbiani F, Krapp HG, Koch C & Laurent G Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming. Nature 420, 320– 324, doi: 10.1038/nature01190 (2002). 12447440 · DOI
  21. [26]Peron S & Gabbiani F Spike frequency adaptation mediates looming stimulus selectivity in a collision-detecting neuron. Nature neuroscience 12, 318– 326, doi: 10.1038/nn.2259 (2009). 19198607 PMC2662764 · DOI
  22. [27]Jones PW & Gabbiani F Synchronized neural input shapes stimulus selectivity in a collision-detecting neuron. Current biology: CB 20, 2052– 2057, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.025 (2010). 21055939 PMC2998055 · DOI
  23. [28]Woolsey TA & Van der Loos H The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain research 17, 205– 242 (1970). 4904874
  24. [31]Kvon EZ Genome-scale functional characterization of Drosophila developmental enhancers in vivo. Nature 512, 91– 95, doi: 10.1038/nature13395 (2014). 24896182 · DOI
  25. [32]Pfeiffer BD Refinement of tools for targeted gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics 186, 735– 755, doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.119917 (2010). 20697123 PMC2942869 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [34]Aso Y The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning. eLife 3, e04577, doi: 10.7554/eLife.04577 (2014). PMC4273437 25535793 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [35]Wagh DA Bruchpilot, a protein with homology to ELKS/CAST, is required for structural integrity and function of synaptic active zones in Drosophila. Neuron 49, 833– 844, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.008 (2006). 16543132 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [36]Iwai Y Axon patterning requires DN-cadherin, a novel neuronal adhesion receptor, in the Drosophila embryonic CNS. Neuron 19, 77– 89 (1997). 9247265
  29. [37]Peng H, Ruan Z, Long F, Simpson JH & Myers EW V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets. Nature biotechnology 28, 348– 353, doi: 10.1038/nbt.1612 (2010). PMC2857929 20231818 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [38]Wan Y, Otsuna H, Chien CB & Hansen C FluoRender: An Application of 2D Image Space Methods for 3D and 4D Confocal Microscopy Data Visualization in Neurobiology Research. IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium: [proceedings]. IEEE Pacific Visualisation Symposium, 201– 208 (2012). PMC3622106 23584131
  31. [39]Strother JA, Nern A & Reiser MB Direct observation of ON and OFF pathways in the Drosophila visual system. Current biology: CB 24, 976– 983, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.017 (2014). 24704075 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [40]Franceschini N & Kirschfeld K Les phénomènes de pseudopupille dans l’oeil composé deDrosophila. Kybernetik 9, 159– 182 (1971). 5134358
  33. [41]Pologruto TA, Sabatini BL & Svoboda K ScanImage: flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes. Biomedical engineering online 2, 13, doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-2-13 (2003). 12801419 PMC161784 · DOI
  34. [42]Wilson RI, Turner GC & Laurent G Transformation of olfactory representations in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Science 303, 366– 370, doi: 10.1126/science.1090782 (2004). 14684826 · DOI
  35. [43]Gabbiani F, Krapp HG & Laurent G Computation of object approach by a wide-field, motion-sensitive neuron. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 19, 1122– 1141 (1999). 9920674 PMC6782150
  36. [44]Schneider CA, Rasband WS & Eliceiri KW NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods 9, 671– 675 (2012). 22930834 PMC5554542

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klapoetke, N. C., Nern, A., Peek, M. Y., Rogers, E. M., Breads, P., Rubin, G. M., Reiser, M. B., & Card, G. M.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Reiser, Michael B.
  • Card, Gwyneth M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2017-11-09
Volume
551
Issue
7679
Pages
237-241
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2767680158
Cited by
173
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
looming detection, directionally selective neurons, lobula plate, dendritic morphology, excitation-inhibition balance, calcium imaging
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Dendrites, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Motion Perception, Motor Neurons, Neural Inhibition, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review