Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 710

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation

Open access
Zetsche, Bernd, Volz, Sara E, Zhang, Feng·2015·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

1Department of Oncology-Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. 2Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Life Sciences (BILS), Stockholm, Sweden. 3Minnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 4Department of Biochemistry, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. 5Life Sciences Computation Centre, Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative, Melbourne, Australia. 6Analytical Biochemistry, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 7Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 8School of Biotechnology, Science for Life Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology KTH, Stockholm, Sweden. 9Plant Research International, Wageningen University and Research Center, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 10Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Center, studies. Given the one constant across all the omics fields—that technologies and data analysis needs continually change—this flexibility toward new software and data types should prove beneficial. Galaxy’s transparency and shareability also facilitates reproducible and publicly available analyses of the ‘Big Data’ produced in omics studies. Coupled with emerging efforts to make workflow frameworks interoperable13,14, the sharing functions inherent to frameworks such as Galaxy could transform the way in which largescale molecular data are exchanged, wherein raw data along with the complete workflow used for its analysis would be deposited and made publically available. With this vision in mind, we hope that this article will stimulate a much-needed discussion on the best ways to meet the challenges of multi-omic data analysis and move us closer to realizing its potential for biological discovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3149

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 710

Metadata

Authors
Zetsche, B., Volz, S. E., & Zhang, F.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2015-02
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
139-142
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2032141669
Cited by
710
References
11
FWCI
31.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt.3149
The paper
Zetsche, B., Volz, S. E., & Zhang, F. (2015). A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3149

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.