Cited by 38Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies

McHughen, Alan·2007·Nature Biotechnology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt0707-725

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent developments may lead to a revaluation of the current rDNA process-based regulatory trigger for GE organisms to a more scientifically defensible product-based approach centered on the novelty and any unique risks associated with the phenotype of the product rather than the process used to accomplish the genetic modification.

    “These developments may lead to a revaluation of the current rDNA process-based regulatory trigger for GE organisms to a more scientifically defensible product-based approach centered on the novelty and any unique risks associated with the phenotype of the product rather than the process used to accomplish the genetic modification (Bradford et al., 2005; McHughen, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McHughen, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
McHughen, Alan
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2007-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
725-727
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2094021797
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
agricultural biotechnology, biotechnology regulation, regulatory policy, scientific legitimacy, genetically modified crops, biosafety
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Biotechnology, Public Policy, Crops, Agricultural, Advisory Committees, Plants, Genetically Modified, Government Regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review