The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An anti-infective peptide that selectively modulates the innate immune response
Abstract
We show that an innate defense-regulator peptide (IDR-1) was protective in mouse models of infection with important Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. When given from 48 h before to 6 h after infection, the peptide was effective by both local and systemic administration. Because protection by IDR-1 was prevented by in vivo depletion of monocytes and macrophages, but not neutrophils or B- and T-lymphocytes, we conclude that monocytes and macrophages are key effector cells. IDR-1 was not directly antimicrobial: gene and protein expression analysis in human and mouse monocytes and macrophages indicated that IDR-1, acting through mitogen-activated protein kinase and other signaling pathways, enhanced the levels of monocyte chemokines while reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine responses. To our knowledge, an innate defense regulator that counters infection by selective modulation of innate immunity without obvious toxicities has not been reported previously.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reaction of neutrophils and macrophages during infection triggers the production of innate defence regulatory peptide 1 IDR1, with similar activity to defensins or cathelicidins [223].”
From Superoxide Anion Chemistry—Its Role at the Core of the Innate Immunity (2023) · cites this paper as [223]
Citations
Cites
A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR
Pfaffl, M. W. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 · Cited by 34,610
Trends in antimicrobial drug development: Implications for the future
Spellberg, B., Powers, J. H., Brass, E. P., Miller, L. G., & Edwards, J. E. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/420937 · Cited by 867
Alarmins: chemotactic activators of immune responses
Oppenheim, J. J., & Yang, D. (2005) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2005.06.002 · Cited by 780
NLRs join TLRs as innate sensors of pathogens
Martinon, F., & Tschopp, J. (2005) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2005.06.004 · Cited by 673
Toll-Like Receptors: Linking Innate and Adaptive Immunity
Pasare, C., & Medzhitov, R. M. (2005) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/0-387-24180-9_2 · Cited by 666
How Toll-like receptors signal: what we know and what we don’t know
O'Neill, L. A. J. (2005) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2005.11.012 · Cited by 614
Mookherjee, N., Brown, K. L., Bowdish, D. M. E., Doria, S., Falsafi, R., Hokamp, K., Roche, F. M., Mu, R., Doho, G., Pistolic, J., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2455 · Cited by 562
Self-citationInnate immune responses to infection
Tosi, M. F. (2005) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.036 · Cited by 387
Impact of LL-37 on anti-infective immunity
Bowdish, D. M. E., Davidson, D. J., Lau, Y. E., Lee, K. C. L., Scott, M. G., & Hancock, R. E. W. (2004) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0704380 · Cited by 382
Self-citationCavaillon, J., Adib‐Conquy, M., Fitting, C., Adrie, C., & Payen, D. M. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1080/00365540310015935 · Cited by 336
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- National Research Council Treating Infectious Diseases in a Microbial World: Report of Two Workshops. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, (2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–401 of 401
Xin, Y., Wang, X., Wu, Y., Liu, Q., Ren, Q., Wang, H., & Zhai, J. (2026) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.71100
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, M. G., Dullaghan, E., Mookherjee, N., Glavas, N., Waldbrook, M., Thompson, A., Wang, A., Lee, K., Doria, S., Hamill, P., Yu, J. J., Li, Y., Donini, O., Guarna, M. M., Finlay, B. B., North, J. R., & Hancock, R. E. W.
- Affiliations
- City of Vancouver (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hancock, Robert E W
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biotechnology
- Published
- 2007-03-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-472
- ISSN
- 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
- 1087-0156
- 1546-1696
- OpenAlex
- W2040733257
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 25.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- monocytes, macrophages, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Salmonella typhimurium, Gram-positive pathogens, Gram-negative pathogens, inflammatory cytokines, MAPK signaling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Bacterial Infections, Disease Models, Animal, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Peptides, Treatment Outcome, Models, Immunological, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review