Cited by 867Antibiotic Use and ResistancePharmaceutical Economics and PolicyAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Trends in antimicrobial drug development: Implications for the future

Spellberg, B., Powers, J. H., Brass, E. P., Miller, L. G., Edwards, J. E.·2004·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The need for new antimicrobial agents is greater than ever because of the emergence of multidrug resistance in common pathogens, the rapid emergence of new infections, and the potential for use of multidrug-resistant agents in bioweapons. Paradoxically, some pharmaceutical companies have indicated that they are curtailing anti-infective research programs. We evaluated the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases of approved drugs and the research and development programs of the world's largest pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to document trends in the development of new antimicrobial agents. FDA approval of new antibacterial agents decreased by 56% over the past 20 years (1998-2002 vs. 1983-1987). Projecting future development, new antibacterial agents constitute 6 of 506 drugs disclosed in the developmental programs of the largest pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Despite the critical need for new antimicrobial agents, the development of these agents is declining. Solutions encouraging and facilitating the development of new antimicrobial agents are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/420937

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spellberg, B., Powers, J. H., Brass, E. P., Miller, L. G., & Edwards, J. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
1279-1286
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2156522255
Cited by
867
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 53
FWCI
58.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P01 AI-37194, R01AI019990, R01-AI19990, P01AI037194)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
antimicrobial drug development, antibacterial agents, multidrug resistance, FDA drug approval, biotechnology companies, emerging infectious diseases, bioterrorism, research funding
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Industry, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Forecasting, Humans, Technology, Pharmaceutical, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Design, Drug Approval, Drug Resistance, Multiple

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review