Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 648

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis

Open access
Down, Thomas A, Rakyan, Vardhman K, Turner, Daniel J, Flicek, Paul, Li, Heng, Kulesha, Eugene, Gräf, Stefan, Johnson, Nathan, Herrero, Javier, Tomazou, Eleni M, Thorne, Natalie P, Bäckdahl, Liselotte, Herberth, Marlis, Howe, Kevin L, Jackson, David K, Miretti, Marcos M, Marioni, John C, Birney, Ewan, Hubbard, Tim J P, Durbin, Richard, Tavaré, Simon, Beck, Stephan·2008·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

DNA methylation is an indispensible epigenetic modification required for regulating the expression of mammalian genomes. Immunoprecipitation-based methods for DNA methylome analysis are rapidly shifting the bottleneck in this field from data generation to data analysis, necessitating the development of better analytical tools. In particular, an inability to estimate absolute methylation levels remains a major analytical difficulty associated with immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylation profiling. To address this issue, we developed a cross-platform algorithm—Bayesian tool for methylation analysis (Batman)—for analyzing methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) profiles generated using oligonucleotide arrays (MeDIP-chip) or next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-seq). We developed the latter approach to provide a high-resolution whole-genome DNA methylation profile (DNA methylome) of a mammalian genome. Strong correlation of our data, obtained using mature human spermatozoa, with those obtained using bisulfite sequencing suggest that combining MeDIP-seq or MeDIP-chip with Batman provides a robust, quantitative and cost-effective functional genomic strategy for elucidating the function of DNA methylation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt1414

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 648

Metadata

Authors
Down, T. A., Rakyan, V. K., Turner, D. J., Flicek, P., Li, H., Kulesha, E., Gräf, S., Johnson, N., Herrero, J., Tomazou, E. M., Thorne, N. P., Bäckdahl, L., Herberth, M., Howe, K. L., Jackson, D. K., Miretti, M. M., Marioni, J. C., Birney, E., Hubbard, T. J. P., Durbin, R., Tavaré, S., & Beck, S.
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2008-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
779-785
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W1979674827
Cited by
648
References
5
FWCI
22.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nbt1414
The paper
Down, T. A., Rakyan, V. K., Turner, D. J., Flicek, P., Li, H., Kulesha, E., Gräf, S., Johnson, N., Herrero, J., Tomazou, E. M., Thorne, N. P., Bäckdahl, L., Herberth, M., Howe, K. L., Jackson, D. K., Miretti, M. M., Marioni, J. C., Birney, E., Hubbard, T. J. P., . . . Beck, S. (2008). A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nature Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1414

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.