Cited by 651Origins and Evolution of LifeSupramolecular Self-Assembly in MaterialsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Peptide–nucleotide microdroplets as a step towards a membrane-free protocell model

Koga, Shogo, Williams, David S., Perriman, Adam W., Mann, Stephen·2011·Nature Chemistry

Abstract

Although phospholipid bilayers are ubiquitous in modern cells, their impermeability, lack of dynamic properties, and synthetic complexity are difficult to reconcile with plausible pathways of proto-metabolism, growth and division. Here, we present an alternative membrane-free model, which demonstrates that low-molecular-weight mononucleotides and simple cationic peptides spontaneously accumulate in water into microdroplets that are stable to changes in temperature and salt concentration, undergo pH-induced cycles of growth and decay, and promote α-helical peptide secondary structure. Moreover, the microdroplets selectively sequester porphyrins, inorganic nanoparticles and enzymes to generate supramolecular stacked arrays of light-harvesting molecules, nanoparticle-mediated oxidase activity, and enhanced rates of glucose phosphorylation, respectively. Taken together, our results suggest that peptide-nucleotide microdroplets can be considered as a new type of protocell model that could be used to develop novel bioreactors, primitive artificial cells and plausible pathways to prebiotic organization before the emergence of lipid-based compartmentalization on the early Earth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchem.1110

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of liquid-liquid phase separation suggest that this phenomenon might be relevant to protocell structure and function.

    “studies of liquid-liquid phase separation suggest that this phenomenon might be relevant to protocell structure and function”

    From Protocells and RNA Self-Replication (2018) · cites this paper as Koga et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koga, S., Williams, D. S., Perriman, A. W., & Mann, S.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Mann, Stephen
Venue
Nature Chemistry
Published
2011-08-07
Volume
3
Issue
9
Pages
720-724
ISSN
  • 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-4349
OpenAlex
W2105311961
Cited by
651
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H029230/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
cationic peptides, mononucleotides, glucose phosphorylation, enzyme encapsulation, bioreactors, artificial cells
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Nucleotides, Peptides, Nanoparticles, Artificial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review