CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mutations along a TET2 active site scaffold stall oxidation at 5-hydroxymethylcytosine

Liu, Monica Yun, Torabifard, Hedieh, Crawford, Daniel J, DeNizio, Jamie E, Cao, Xing-Jun, Garcia, Benjamin A, Cisneros, G Andrés, Kohli, Rahul M·2017·Nature Chemical Biology
DOI 10.1038/nchembio.2250PMC PMC5370579
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nchembio.2250

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930–935 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ito, S. et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature 466, 1129–1133 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Pfaffeneder, T. et al. The discovery of 5-formylcytosine in embryonic stem cell DNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 50, 7008–7012 (2011). · DOI
  4. He, Y.F. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333, 1303–1307 (2011). · DOI
  5. Bachman, M. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is a predominantly stable DNA modification. Nat. Chem. 6, 1049–1055 (2014). · DOI
  6. Bachman, M. et al. 5-Formylcytosine can be a stable DNA modification in mammals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 555–557 (2015). · DOI
  7. Wu, H. & Zhang, Y. Charting oxidized methylcytosines at base resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 656–661 (2015). · DOI
  8. Liu, M.Y., DeNizio, J.E., Schutsky, E.K. & Kohli, R.M. The expanding scope and impact of epigenetic cytosine modifications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 33, 67–73 (2016). · DOI
  9. Zheng, G., Fu, Y. & He, C. Nucleic acid oxidation in DNA damage repair and epigenetics. Chem. Rev. 114, 4602–4620 (2014). · DOI
  10. Hu, L. et al. Structural insight into substrate preference for TET-mediated oxidation. Nature 527, 118–122 (2015). · DOI
  11. Hu, L. et al. Crystal structure of TET2-DNA complex: insight into TET-mediated 5mC oxidation. Cell 155, 1545–1555 (2013). · DOI
  12. Lu, J. et al. A computational investigation on the substrate preference of ten-eleven-translocation 2 (TET2). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 4728–4738 (2016). · DOI
  13. Maiti, A. & Drohat, A.C. Thymine DNA glycosylase can rapidly excise 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine: potential implications for active demethylation of CpG sites. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 35334–35338 (2011). · DOI
  14. Weber, A.R. et al. Biochemical reconstitution of TET1-TDG-BER-dependent active DNA demethylation reveals a highly coordinated mechanism. Nat. Commun. 7, 10806 (2016). · DOI
  15. Iurlaro, M. et al. A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation. Genome Biol. 14, R119 (2013). · DOI
  16. Crawford, D.J. et al. Tet2 catalyzes stepwise 5-methylcytosine oxidation by an iterative and de novo mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 730–733 (2016). · DOI
  17. Fang, D., Lord, R.L. & Cisneros, G.A. Ab initio QM/MM calculations show an intersystem crossing in the hydrogen abstraction step in dealkylation catalyzed by AlkB. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 6410–6420 (2013). · DOI
  18. Fang, D. & Cisneros, G.A. Alternative pathway for the reaction catalyzed by DNA dealkylase AlkB from ab initio QM/MM calculations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 5136–5148 (2014). · DOI
  19. Hashimoto, H. et al. Structure of Naegleria Tet-like dioxygenase (NgTet1) in complexes with a reaction intermediate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 10713–10721 (2015). · DOI
  20. Abdel-Wahab, O. et al. Genetic characterization of TET1, TET2, and TET3 alterations in myeloid malignancies. Blood 114, 144–147 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Scourzic, L., Mouly, E. & Bernard, O.A. TET proteins and the control of cytosine demethylation in cancer. Genome Med. 7, 9 (2015). · DOI
  22. Cliffe, L.J. et al. JBP1 and JBP2 are two distinct thymidine hydroxylases involved in J biosynthesis in genomic DNA of African trypanosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1452–1462 (2009). · DOI
  23. Bullard, W., Lopes da Rosa-Spiegler, J., Liu, S., Wang, Y. & Sabatini, R. Identification of the glucosyltransferase that converts hydroxymethyluracil to base J in the trypanosomatid genome. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 20273–20282 (2014). · DOI
  24. Pei, J., Kim, B.H. & Grishin, N.V. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2295–2300 (2008). · DOI
  25. Hu, X. et al. Tet and TDG mediate DNA demethylation essential for mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 14, 512–522 (2014). · DOI
  26. Neri, F. et al. TET1 is a tumour suppressor that inhibits colon cancer growth by derepressing inhibitors of the WNT pathway. Oncogene 34, 4168–4176 (2015). · DOI
  27. Gu, T.P. et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 477, 606–610 (2011). · DOI
  28. Liu, M.Y., DeNizio, J.E. & Kohli, R.M. Quantification of oxidized 5-methylcytosine bases and TET enzyme activity. Methods Enzymol. 573, 365–385 (2016). · DOI
  29. Chen, V.B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jorgensen, W.L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J.D., Impey, R.W. & Klein, M.L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926 (1983). · DOI
  31. Dolinsky, T.J., Nielsen, J.E., McCammon, J.A. & Baker, N.A. PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics calculations. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W665–W667 (2004). · DOI
  32. Dolinsky, T.J. et al. PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W522–W525 (2007). · DOI
  33. Olsson, M.H., Søndergaard, C.R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J.H. PROPKA3: Consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 525–537 (2011). · DOI
  34. Bradbrook, G.M. et al. X-Ray and molecular dynamics studies of concanavalin-A glucoside and mannoside complexes relating structure to thermodynamics of binding. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 94, 1603–1611 (1998). · DOI
  35. Oda, A., Yamaotsu, N. & Hirono, S. New AMBER force field parameters of heme iron for cytochrome P450s determined by quantum chemical calculations of simplified models. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 818–826 (2005). · DOI
  36. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995). · DOI
  37. Roe, D.R. & Cheatham, T.E. III. PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3084–3095 (2013). · DOI
  38. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38, 27–28 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Johnson, E.R. et al. Revealing noncovalent interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 6498–6506 (2010). · DOI
  40. Contreras-García, J. et al. NCIPLOT: a program for plotting non-covalent interaction regions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 625–632 (2011). · DOI
  41. Graham, S.E., Syeda, F. & Cisneros, G.A. Computational prediction of residues involved in fidelity checking for DNA synthesis in DNA polymerase I. Biochemistry 51, 2569–2578 (2012). · DOI
  42. Elias, A.A. & Cisneros, G.A. Computational study of putative residues involved in DNA synthesis fidelity checking in Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 96, 39–75 (2014). · DOI
  43. Dewage, S.W. & Cisneros, G.A. Computational analysis of ammonia transfer along two intramolecular tunnels in Staphylococcus aureus glutamine-dependent amidotransferase (GatCAB). J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 3669–3677 (2015). · DOI
  44. Cui, Q. & Karplus, M. Catalysis and specificity in enzymes: a study of triosephosphate isomerase and comparison with methyl glyoxal synthase. Adv. Protein Chem. 66, 315–372 (2003). · DOI
  45. Martí, S. et al. Preorganization and reorganization as related factors in enzyme catalysis: the chorismate mutase case. Chemistry 9, 984–991 (2003). · DOI
  46. Senn, H.M., O'Hagan, D. & Thiel, W. Insight into enzymatic C-F bond formation from QM and QM/MM calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 13643–13655 (2005). · DOI
  47. Cisneros, G.A. et al. Reaction mechanism of the epsilon subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III: insights into active site metal coordination and catalytically significant residues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1550–1556 (2009). · DOI
  48. Maiti, A., Michelson, A.Z., Armwood, C.J., Lee, J.K. & Drohat, A.C. Divergent mechanisms for enzymatic excision of 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine from DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15813–15822 (2013). · DOI
  49. Morgan, M.T., Bennett, M.T. & Drohat, A.C. Excision of 5-halogenated uracils by human thymine DNA glycosylase. Robust activity for DNA contexts other than CpG. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 27578–27586 (2007). · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Liu, M. Y., Torabifard, H., Crawford, D. J., DeNizio, J. E., Cao, X.-J., Garcia, B. A., Cisneros, G. A., & Kohli, R. M.
Venue
Nature Chemical Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
181-187
ISSN
  • 1552-4450
  • 1552-4469
DOI
10.1038/nchembio.2250
PMC
PMC5370579
Cited by
78
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review