Cited by 307Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest ecology and management

Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity

Open access
Sakschewski, Boris, von Bloh, Werner, Boit, Alice, Poorter, Lourens, Peña-Claros, Marielos, Heinke, Jens, Joshi, Jasmin, Thonicke, Kirsten·2016·Nature Climate Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate3109

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tree functional diversity increases forest adaptability to climate change by offering various possibilities of functioning.

    “Tree functional diversity increases forest adaptability to climate chance by offering various possibilities of functioning99.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

    The indexed Abstract says functional diversity can enhance ecosystem resilience by providing greater response diversity, and that plant trait diversity may enable Amazon forests to adjust to new climate conditions. This supports the proposed mechanism, but the citing sentence states the effect as certain for forests generally, whereas the paper's own finding is qualified and concerns Amazon forests. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Significant effects on simulation results may emerge from increasing plant functional diversity, representation of key physiological trade-offs and other features that determine water stress on plants, and allowing for community adjustment to environmental heterogeneity and global change.

    “Significant effects on simulation results may emerge from increasing plant functional diversity, representation of key physiological trade-offs and other features that determine water stress on plants, and also allowing for community adjustment to environmental heterogeneity and global change32,55,62,99.”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

    The available passages contain the title and bibliographic records, but no substantive findings. Searches for simulation effects, physiological trade-offs, water stress, and community adjustment returned no passages addressing the claim, so our copy cannot verify what is attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Simulating individual trees can improve the representation of growth and mortality dynamics, which ultimately affect forest dynamics.

    “Simulating individual trees can improve the representation of growth and mortality dynamics, which ultimately affect forest dynamics (for example, refs. 61,62,99).”

    From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [99]

    The supplied passages and additional searches for individual trees, growth, mortality, and forest modelling returned bibliographic material rather than a passage addressing the claim. Our indexed copy therefore does not establish whether the paper says that simulating individual trees improves the representation of growth and mortality dynamics. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakschewski, B., von Bloh, W., Boit, A., Poorter, L., Peña-Claros, M., Heinke, J., Joshi, J., & Thonicke, K.
Affiliations
  • Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (DE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
Corresponding author
Sakschewski, Boris
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2016-08-29
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
1032-1036
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2512840844
Cited by
307
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 2
FWCI
22.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
functional diversity, Amazon rainforest, forest resilience, ecological sorting, climate change, forest biomass, carbon sink, biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review