Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proteomic maps of breast cancer subtypes

Open access
Tyanova, Stefka, Albrechtsen, Reidar, Kronqvist, Pauliina, Cox, Juergen, Mann, Matthias, Geiger, Tamar·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Systems-wide profiling of breast cancer has almost always entailed RNA and DNA analysis by microarray and sequencing techniques. Marked developments in proteomic technologies now enable very deep profiling of clinical samples, with high identification and quantification accuracy. We analysed 40 oestrogen receptor positive (luminal), Her2 positive and triple negative breast tumours and reached a quantitative depth of >10,000 proteins. These proteomic profiles identified functional differences between breast cancer subtypes, related to energy metabolism, cell growth, mRNA translation and cell–cell communication. Furthermore, we derived a signature of 19 proteins, which differ between the breast cancer subtypes, through support vector machine (SVM)-based classification and feature selection. Remarkably, only three proteins of the signature were associated with gene copy number variations and eleven were also reflected on the mRNA level. These breast cancer features revealed by our work provide novel insights that may ultimately translate to development of subtype-specific therapeutics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms10259

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Yang, F. et al. Laser microdissection and microarray analysis of breast tumours reveal ER-alpha related genes and pathways. Oncogene 25, 1413–1419 (2006). · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209165
  2. Bowie, M. L. et al. Interferon regulatory factor-1 regulates reconstituted extracellular matrix (rECM)-mediated apoptosis in human mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene 26, 2017–2026 (2007). · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210013
  3. Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M. & Vapnik, V. N. in Proceedings of the 5th Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory COLT'92 (ACM Press, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, (1992).
  4. Tennekes, M. & Jonge, E. Top-down data analysis with treemaps. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications IVAPP Algarve, Portugal (2011).

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Tyanova, S., Albrechtsen, R., Kronqvist, P., Cox, J., Mann, M., & Geiger, T.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-01-04
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
10259-10259
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2260700459
Cited by
328
References
45
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proteomic maps of breast cancer subtypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms10259
The paper
Tyanova, S., Albrechtsen, R., Kronqvist, P., Cox, J., Mann, M., & Geiger, T. (2016). Proteomic maps of breast cancer subtypes. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.