Cited by 114

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implementation of quantum and classical discrete fractional Fourier transforms

Weimann, Steffen, Perez-Leija, Armando, Lebugle, Maxime, Keil, Robert, Tichy, Malte, Gräfe, Markus, Heilmann, René, Nolte, Stefan, Moya-Cessa, Hector, Weihs, Gregor, Christodoulides, Demetrios N., Szameit, Alexander·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Fourier transforms, integer and fractional, are ubiquitous mathematical tools in basic and applied science. Certainly, since the ordinary Fourier transform is merely a particular case of a continuous set of fractional Fourier domains, every property and application of the ordinary Fourier transform becomes a special case of the fractional Fourier transform. Despite the great practical importance of the discrete Fourier transform, implementation of fractional orders of the corresponding discrete operation has been elusive. Here we report classical and quantum optical realizations of the discrete fractional Fourier transform. In the context of classical optics, we implement discrete fractional Fourier transforms of exemplary wave functions and experimentally demonstrate the shift theorem. Moreover, we apply this approach in the quantum realm to Fourier transform separable and path-entangled biphoton wave functions. The proposed approach is versatile and could find applications in various fields where Fourier transforms are essential tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms11027

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such bi-partite quantum walks give rise to interesting quantum correlation patterns.

    “that gives rise to interesting quantum correlation patterns [157,158]”

    From Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect (2021) · cites this paper as [157]

  • The computational complexity of BosonSampling is rooted in the hardness of evaluating the permanent in the scattering amplitudes.

    “The computational complexity of the problem is rooted in the hardness [562] of evaluating the permanent in the scattering amplitudes [563]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [562]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Namias, V. The fractional order Fourier transform and its application to quantum mechanics. J. Inst. Maths. Applics 25, 241–265 (1980). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Almeida, L. B. The fractional Fourier transform and time-frequency representations. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42, 3084–3091 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ozaktas, H. M. & Mendlovic, D. Fractional Fourier Optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 743–751 (1995). · DOI
  4. Ozaktas, H. M., Zalevsky, Z. & Kutay, M. A. The Fractional Fourier Transform with Applications in Optics and Signal Processing Wiley (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lohmann, A. W. & Soffer, B. H. Relationship between the Radon–Wigner and fractional Fourier transforms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1798–1801 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Man’ko, M. A. Fractional Fourier transform in information processing, tomography of optical signal, and green function of harmonic oscillator. J. of Russ. Laser Research 20, 226–228 (1999). · DOI
  7. Dorsch, R. G., Lohmann, A. W., Bitran, Y., Mendlovic, D. & Ozaktas, H. M. Chirp filtering in the fractional Fourier domain. Appl. Opt. 33, 7599–7602 (1994). · DOI
  8. Lohmann, A. W. & Mendlovic, D. Fractional Fourier transform: photonic implementation. Appl. Opt. 33, 7661–7664 (1994). · DOI
  9. Lohmann, A. W. Image rotation, Wigner rotation, and the Fractional Fourier transform. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2181–2186 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mendlovic, D. & Ozaktas, H. Fractional Fourier transforms and their optical implementation: I. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 1875–1881 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Atakishiyev, N. M. & Wolf, K. B. Fractional Fourier-Kravchuk transform. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1467–1477 (1997). · DOI
  12. Tichy, M. C., Mayer, K., Buchleitner, A. & Molmer, K. Stringent and efficient assessment of Boson Sampling Devices. Phys. Rev Lett. 113, 020502–020506 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Perez-Leija, A., Keil, R. & Moya-Cessa, H. Perfect transfer of path-entangled photons in J x-photonic lattices, A. Szameit, and D. N. Christodoulides. Phys. Rev. A 87, 022303 (2013). · DOI
  14. Humphreys, P. C., Barbieri, M., Datta, A. & Walmsley, I. A. Quantum enhanced multiple phase estimation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 070403 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Perez-Leija, A. et al. Eigenstate-assisted longitudinal quantum state transfer and qubit-storage in photonic and spin lattices, 45-th annual meeting of the APS Division of Atomic. Molecular and optical Physics 59, J4.010 (2014).
  16. Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated Quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704–1707 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wolf, K. B. Integral transforms in science and engineering Vol. 11, Mathematical Concepts and Methods for Science and Engineering (1979). · DOI
  18. Narducci, L. M. & Orzag, M. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of angular momentum operator J x without theory of rotations. Am. J. of Phys 40, 1811–1814 (1972). · DOI
  19. Lieb, E., Schultz, T. & Matts, D. Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain. Ann. Phys. 16, 407–466 (1961). · DOI
  20. Cormick, C., Bermudez, A., Huelga, S. F. & Plenio, M. Preparation of the ground state of a spin chain by dissipation in a structured environment. New J. Phys. 15, 073027 (2013). · DOI
  21. Bobrov, I. B., Kalashnikov, D. A. & Krivitsky, L. A. Imaging of spatial correlations of two-photon states. Phys. Rev. A 89, 043814 (2014). · DOI
  22. Peeters, W. H., Renema, J. J. & van Exter, M. P. Engineering of two-photon spatial quantum correlations behind a double slit. Phys. Rev. A 79, 043817 (2009). · DOI
  23. Poem, E., Gilead, Y., Lahini, Y. & Silberberg, Y. Fourier processing of quantum light. Phys. Rev. A 86, 023836 (2012). · DOI
  24. Wiseman, H. M. & Milburn, G. J. Quantum Measurement and control Cambridge University Press (2010). · DOI
  25. Orlowski, A. & Paul, H. Phase retrieval in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 50, R921–R924 (1994). · DOI
  26. Wood, J. & Barry, D. T. Radon transformation of time-frequency distributions for analysis of multicomponent signals. IEEE Transac. Signal Process. 42, 3166–3177 (1994). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Vogel, K. & Risken, H. Determination of quasiprobability distributions in terms of probability distributions for the rotated quadrature phase. Phys. Rev. A 40, 2847 (1989). · DOI
  28. Raymer, M. G., Beck, M. & McAlister, D. F. Quantum Optics VI eds Harvey J. D., Wall D. F. Springer-Verlag (1994).
  29. Ozaktas, H. M. & Mendlovic, D. Fractional Fourier transforms and their optical implementations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2522–2531 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Marhic, M. E. Roots of the identity operator and optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 1448 (1995). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weimann, S., Perez-Leija, A., Lebugle, M., Keil, R., Tichy, M., Gräfe, M., Heilmann, R., Nolte, S., Moya-Cessa, H., Weihs, G., Christodoulides, D. N., & Szameit, A.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-03-23
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
114
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review