Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes

Open access
Morganella, Sandro, Alexandrov, Ludmil B., Glodzik, Dominik, Zou, Xueqing, Davies, Helen, Staaf, Johan, Sieuwerts, Anieta M., Brinkman, Arie B., Martin, Sancha, Ramakrishna, Manasa, Butler, Adam, Kim, Hyung-Yong, Borg, Åke, Sotiriou, Christos, Futreal, P. Andrew, Campbell, Peter J., Span, Paul N., Van Laere, Steven, Lakhani, Sunil R., Eyfjord, Jorunn E., Thompson, Alastair M., Stunnenberg, Hendrik G., van de Vijver, Marc J., Martens, John W. M., Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Richardson, Andrea L., Kong, Gu, Thomas, Gilles, Sale, Julian, Rada, Cristina, Stratton, Michael R., Birney, Ewan, Nik-Zainal, Serena·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Somatic mutations in human cancers show unevenness in genomic distribution that correlate with aspects of genome structure and function. These mutations are, however, generated by multiple mutational processes operating through the cellular lineage between the fertilized egg and the cancer cell, each composed of specific DNA damage and repair components and leaving its own characteristic mutational signature on the genome. Using somatic mutation catalogues from 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences, here we show that each of 12 base substitution, 2 insertion/deletion (indel) and 6 rearrangement mutational signatures present in breast tissue, exhibit distinct relationships with genomic features relating to transcription, DNA replication and chromatin organization. This signature-based approach permits visualization of the genomic distribution of mutational processes associated with APOBEC enzymes, mismatch repair deficiency and homologous recombinational repair deficiency, as well as mutational processes of unknown aetiology. Furthermore, it highlights mechanistic insights including a putative replication-dependent mechanism of APOBEC-related mutagenesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms11383

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Morganella, S., Alexandrov, L. B., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Davies, H., Staaf, J., Sieuwerts, A. M., Brinkman, A. B., Martin, S., Ramakrishna, M., Butler, A., Kim, H.-Y., Borg, Å., Sotiriou, C., Futreal, P. A., Campbell, P. J., Span, P. N., Van Laere, S., Lakhani, S. R., Eyfjord, J. E., Thompson, A. M., Stunnenberg, H. G., van de Vijver, M. J., Martens, J. W. M., Børresen-Dale, A.-L., Richardson, A. L., Kong, G., Thomas, G., Sale, J., Rada, C., Stratton, M. R., Birney, E., & Nik-Zainal, S.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-05-02
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11383-11383
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2342628598
Cited by
257
References
49
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms11383
The paper
Morganella, S., Alexandrov, L. B., Glodzik, D., Zou, X., Davies, H., Staaf, J., Sieuwerts, A. M., Brinkman, A. B., Martin, S., Ramakrishna, M., Butler, A., Kim, H.-Y., Borg, Å., Sotiriou, C., Futreal, P. A., Campbell, P. J., Span, P. N., Van Laere, S., Lakhani, S. R., . . . Nik-Zainal, S. (2016). The topography of mutational processes in breast cancer genomes. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11383

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.