Decoupling optical function and geometrical form using conformal flexible dielectric metasurfaces
Open accessAbstract
Physical geometry and optical properties of objects are correlated: cylinders focus light to a line, spheres to a point and arbitrarily shaped objects introduce optical aberrations. Multi-functional components with decoupled geometrical form and optical function are needed when specific optical functionalities must be provided while the shapes are dictated by other considerations like ergonomics, aerodynamics or aesthetics. Here we demonstrate an approach for decoupling optical properties of objects from their physical shape using thin and flexible dielectric metasurfaces which conform to objects' surface and change their optical properties. The conformal metasurfaces are composed of silicon nano-posts embedded in a polymer substrate that locally modify near-infrared (λ=915 nm) optical wavefronts. As proof of concept, we show that cylindrical lenses covered with metasurfaces can be transformed to function as aspherical lenses focusing light to a point. The conformal metasurface concept is highly versatile for developing arbitrarily shaped multi-functional optical devices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
[128] demonstrated an aspherical lens by covering a cylindrical lens with an FIM.
“Additionally, [128] demonstrated an aspherical lens by covering a cylindrical lens with an FIM, and [129] showed that the EM responses of FIMs can be actively tuned by mechanically stretching the flexible substrate.”
From Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications (2026) · cites this paper as [128]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Flat optics with designer metasurfaces
Yu, N., & Capasso, F. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3839 · Cited by 5,984 · see citing works
User-interactive electronic skin for instantaneous pressure visualization
Wang, C., Hwang, D., Yu, Z., Takei, K., Park, J., Chen, T., Ma, B., & Javey, A. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3711 · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Born M. & Wolf E. Principles of Optics Cambridge Univ. Press (1999).
- Shannon R. R. Overview of conformal optics. Proc. SPIE 3705, 180– 188 (1999).
- Knapp D. J. Fundamentals of conformal dome design. Proc. SPIE 4832, 394– 409 (2002).
- Ni X., Wong Z. J., Mrejen M., Wang Y. & Zhang X. An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light. Science 349, 1310– 1314 (2015). 26383946
- Valentine J., Li J., Zentgraf T., Bartal G. & Zhang X. An optical cloak made of dielectrics. Nat. Mater. 8, 568– 571 (2009). 19404237
- Ergin T., Stenger N., Brenner P., Pendry J. B. & Wegener M. Three-dimensional invisibility cloak at optical wavelengths. Science 328, 337– 339 (2010). 20299551
- Teo J. Y. H., Wong L. J., Molardi C. & Genevet P. Controlling electromagnetic fields at boundaries of arbitrary geometries. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06175 (2015). · arXiv
- Zheng G.. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 308– 312 (2015). 25705870
- Kildishev A. V., Boltasseva A. & Shalaev V. M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009 (2013). 23493714
- Lin D., Fan P., Hasman E. & Brongersma M. L. Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements. Science 345, 298– 302 (2014). 25035488
- Arbabi A., Horie Y., Bagheri M. & Faraon A. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 937– 943 (2015). 26322944
- Karimi E.. Generating optical orbital angular momentum at visible wavelengths using a plasmonic metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e167 (2014).
- Arbabi A., Horie Y., Ball A. J., Bagheri M. & Faraon A. Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays. Nat. Commun. 6, 7069 (2015). 25947118
- Vo S.. Sub-wavelength grating lenses with a twist. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 26, 1375– 1378 (2014).
- Falco A. D., Ploschner M. & Krauss T. F. Flexible metamaterials at visible wavelengths. New J. Phys. 12, 113006 (2010).
- Pryce I. M., Aydin K., Kelaita Y. A., Briggs R. M. & Atwater H. A. Highly strained compliant optical metamaterials with large frequency tunability. Nano Lett. 10, 4222– 4227 (2010). 20857941
- Xu X.. Flexible visible-infrared metamaterials and their applications in highly sensitive chemical and biological sensing. Nano Lett. 11, 3232– 3238 (2011). 21696183
- Walia S.. Flexible metasurfaces and metamaterials: a review of materials and fabrication processes at micro-and nano-scales. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2, 011303 (2015).
- Gao L.. Optics and nonlinear buckling mechanics in large-area, highly stretchable arrays of plasmonic nanostructures. ACS Nano. 9, 5968– 5975 (2015). 25906085
- Gutruf P.. Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies. ACS Nano. 10, 133– 141 (2015). 26617198
- Josefsson L. & Persson P. Conformal Array Antenna Theory and Design 29, John Wiley & Sons (2006).
- Lalanne P., Astilean S., Cambril E. & Launois H. Blazed binary subwavelength gratings with efficiencies larger than those of conventional échelette gratings. Opt. Lett. 23, 1081– 1083 (1998). 18087434
- He J., Nuzzo R. G. & Rogers J. Inorganic materials and assembly techniques for flexible and stretchable electronics. Proc. IEEE 103, 619– 632 (2015).
- Kim D.. Stretchable and foldable silicon integrated circuits. Science 320, 507– 511 (2008). 18369106
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications
An, J., Debbah, M., Cui, T. J., Chen, Z. N., & Yuen, C. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.2025.3571069 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“In addition, Kamali et al. [128] demonstrated an aspherical lens by covering a cylindrical lens with an FIM, and Aksu et al. [129] showed that the EM responses of FIMs can be actively tuned by mechanically stretching the flexible substrate.”
Flexible Intelligent Metasurfaces for Enhancing MIMO Communications
An, J., Han, Z., Niyato, D., Debbah, M., Yuen, C., & Hanzo, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2025.3550318 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Downlink Multiuser Communications Relying on Flexible Intelligent Metasurfaces
An, J., Yuen, C., Di Renzo, M., Debbah, M., Poor, H. V., & Hanzo, L. (2024) · GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference · doi:10.1109/globecom52923.2024.10901792 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications
An, J., Debbah, M., Cui, T. J., Chen, Z. N., & Yuen, C. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“In addition, Kamali et al. [128] demonstrated an aspherical lens by covering a cylindrical lens with an FIM, and Aksu et al. [129] showed that the EM responses of FIMs can be actively tuned by mechanically stretching the flexible substrate.”
- Authors
- Kamali, S. M., Arbabi, A., Arbabi, E., Horie, Y., & Faraon, A.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Faraon, Andrei
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2016-05-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11618-11618
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4874029
- OpenAlex
- W2240350106
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001293)
- California Institute of Technology
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Samsung
- Office of Science (DESC0001293)
- Kavli Nanoscience Institute, California Institute of Technology
- Basic Energy Sciences (DE‐SC0001293)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
- Keywords
- conformal metasurface, polymer substrates, aspheric lens, cylindrical lens, optical aberrations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review