Cited by 296Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesOptical Coatings and Gratings

Decoupling optical function and geometrical form using conformal flexible dielectric metasurfaces

Open access
Kamali, Seyedeh Mahsa, Arbabi, Amir, Arbabi, Ehsan, Horie, Yu, Faraon, Andrei·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

Physical geometry and optical properties of objects are correlated: cylinders focus light to a line, spheres to a point and arbitrarily shaped objects introduce optical aberrations. Multi-functional components with decoupled geometrical form and optical function are needed when specific optical functionalities must be provided while the shapes are dictated by other considerations like ergonomics, aerodynamics or aesthetics. Here we demonstrate an approach for decoupling optical properties of objects from their physical shape using thin and flexible dielectric metasurfaces which conform to objects' surface and change their optical properties. The conformal metasurfaces are composed of silicon nano-posts embedded in a polymer substrate that locally modify near-infrared (λ=915 nm) optical wavefronts. As proof of concept, we show that cylindrical lenses covered with metasurfaces can be transformed to function as aspherical lenses focusing light to a point. The conformal metasurface concept is highly versatile for developing arbitrarily shaped multi-functional optical devices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms11618

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Born M. & Wolf E. Principles of Optics Cambridge Univ. Press (1999).
  2. Shannon R. R. Overview of conformal optics. Proc. SPIE 3705, 180– 188 (1999).
  3. Knapp D. J. Fundamentals of conformal dome design. Proc. SPIE 4832, 394– 409 (2002).
  4. Ni X., Wong Z. J., Mrejen M., Wang Y. & Zhang X. An ultrathin invisibility skin cloak for visible light. Science 349, 1310– 1314 (2015). 26383946
  5. Valentine J., Li J., Zentgraf T., Bartal G. & Zhang X. An optical cloak made of dielectrics. Nat. Mater. 8, 568– 571 (2009). 19404237
  6. Ergin T., Stenger N., Brenner P., Pendry J. B. & Wegener M. Three-dimensional invisibility cloak at optical wavelengths. Science 328, 337– 339 (2010). 20299551
  7. Teo J. Y. H., Wong L. J., Molardi C. & Genevet P. Controlling electromagnetic fields at boundaries of arbitrary geometries. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06175 (2015). · arXiv
  8. Zheng G.. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 308– 312 (2015). 25705870
  9. Kildishev A. V., Boltasseva A. & Shalaev V. M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009 (2013). 23493714
  10. Lin D., Fan P., Hasman E. & Brongersma M. L. Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements. Science 345, 298– 302 (2014). 25035488
  11. Arbabi A., Horie Y., Bagheri M. & Faraon A. Dielectric metasurfaces for complete control of phase and polarization with subwavelength spatial resolution and high transmission. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 937– 943 (2015). 26322944
  12. Karimi E.. Generating optical orbital angular momentum at visible wavelengths using a plasmonic metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e167 (2014).
  13. Arbabi A., Horie Y., Ball A. J., Bagheri M. & Faraon A. Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays. Nat. Commun. 6, 7069 (2015). 25947118
  14. Vo S.. Sub-wavelength grating lenses with a twist. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 26, 1375– 1378 (2014).
  15. Falco A. D., Ploschner M. & Krauss T. F. Flexible metamaterials at visible wavelengths. New J. Phys. 12, 113006 (2010).
  16. Pryce I. M., Aydin K., Kelaita Y. A., Briggs R. M. & Atwater H. A. Highly strained compliant optical metamaterials with large frequency tunability. Nano Lett. 10, 4222– 4227 (2010). 20857941
  17. Xu X.. Flexible visible-infrared metamaterials and their applications in highly sensitive chemical and biological sensing. Nano Lett. 11, 3232– 3238 (2011). 21696183
  18. Walia S.. Flexible metasurfaces and metamaterials: a review of materials and fabrication processes at micro-and nano-scales. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2, 011303 (2015).
  19. Gao L.. Optics and nonlinear buckling mechanics in large-area, highly stretchable arrays of plasmonic nanostructures. ACS Nano. 9, 5968– 5975 (2015). 25906085
  20. Gutruf P.. Mechanically tunable dielectric resonator metasurfaces at visible frequencies. ACS Nano. 10, 133– 141 (2015). 26617198
  21. Josefsson L. & Persson P. Conformal Array Antenna Theory and Design 29, John Wiley & Sons (2006).
  22. Lalanne P., Astilean S., Cambril E. & Launois H. Blazed binary subwavelength gratings with efficiencies larger than those of conventional échelette gratings. Opt. Lett. 23, 1081– 1083 (1998). 18087434
  23. He J., Nuzzo R. G. & Rogers J. Inorganic materials and assembly techniques for flexible and stretchable electronics. Proc. IEEE 103, 619– 632 (2015).
  24. Kim D.. Stretchable and foldable silicon integrated circuits. Science 320, 507– 511 (2008). 18369106

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamali, S. M., Arbabi, A., Arbabi, E., Horie, Y., & Faraon, A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Faraon, Andrei
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-05-19
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11618-11618
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2240350106
Cited by
296
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 11
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0001293)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Samsung
  • Office of Science (DESC0001293)
  • Kavli Nanoscience Institute, California Institute of Technology
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE‐SC0001293)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Optical Coatings and Gratings
Keywords
conformal metasurface, polymer substrates, aspheric lens, cylindrical lens, optical aberrations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review