Cited by 6Advanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research

Downlink Multiuser Communications Relying on Flexible Intelligent Metasurfaces

Open access
An, Jiancheng, Yuen, Chau, Di Renzo, Marco, Debbah, Mérouane, Poor, H. Vincent, Hanzo, Lajos·2024·GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference

Abstract

A flexible intelligent metasurface (FIM) is composed of an array of low-cost radiating elements, each of which can independently radiate electromagnetic signals and flexibly adjust its position through a 3D surface-morphing process. In our system, an FIM is deployed at a base station (BS) that transmits to multiple single-antenna users. We formulate an optimization problem for minimizing the total downlink transmit power at the BS by jointly optimizing the transmit beamforming and the FIM’s surface shape, subject to an individual signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraint for each user as well as to a constraint on the maximum morphing range of the FIM. To address this problem, an efficient alternating optimization method is proposed to iteratively update the FIM’s surface shape and the transmit beamformer to gradually reduce the transmit power. Finally, our simulation results show that at a given data rate the FIM reduces the transmit power by about 3 dB compared to conventional rigid 2D arrays.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/globecom52923.2024.10901792

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When considering a single user, the optimal 3D surface shape of the FIM can be achieved by independently adjusting each element to the position with the strongest channel gain.

    “When considering a single user, it was found that the optimal 3D surface shape of the FIM can be achieved by independently adjusting each element to the position with the strongest channel gain, as shown in Fig. 10.”

    From Emerging Technologies in Intelligent Metasurfaces: Shaping the Future of Wireless Communications (2026) · cites this paper as [135]

    The System Model (p. 2) says each FIM element can be positioned independently, and the Introduction (p. 2) describes optimizing the surface shape. But the paper studies a multiuser system and does not state that, for a single user, placing each element at its strongest-channel-gain position yields the optimal shape. Its surface-shape method instead updates the shape to increase SINR margin (Proposed Alternating Optimization Algorithm, p. 4). (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Simulation results in [29], [135] showed that the FIM can reduce the required transmit power by about 3 dB compared to conventional rigid 2D arrays while maintaining the same data rate.

    “Simulation results showed that the FIM can reduce the required transmit power by about 3 dB compared to conventional rigid 2D arrays while maintaining the same data rate.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9][9] H. Liu, J. An, X. Jia, S. Lin, X. Yao, L. Gan, B. Clerckx, C. Yuen, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, 'Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for wireless sensing and communication: Applications and challenges,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03566 , 2024. - · arXiv
  2. [11][11] J. An, C. Yuen, L. Dai, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, and L. Hanzo, 'Nearfield communications: Research advances, potential, and challenges,' arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09242 , 2024, Early Access. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
An, J., Yuen, C., Di Renzo, M., Debbah, M., Poor, H. V., & Hanzo, L.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Université Paris-Saclay,CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes,France,91192
  • Khalifa University of Science and Technology,Center for 6G,Abu Dhabi,United Arab Emirates
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-12-08
Pages
4932-4937
ISSN
1930-529X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408324568
Cited by
4
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Globecom (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministry of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Keywords
transmit beamforming, surface shape optimization, transmit power minimization, SINR constraints, alternating optimization, base station, single-antenna users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review