Cited by 110Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationGeological and Geochemical Analysis

An asteroidal origin for water in the Moon

Open access
Barnes, Jessica J., Kring, David A., Tartèse, Romain, Franchi, Ian A., Anand, Mahesh, Russell, Sara S.·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

The Apollo-derived tenet of an anhydrous Moon has been contested following measurement of water in several lunar samples that require water to be present in the lunar interior. However, significant uncertainties exist regarding the flux, sources and timing of water delivery to the Moon. Here we address those fundamental issues by constraining the mass of water accreted to the Moon and modelling the relative proportions of asteroidal and cometary sources for water that are consistent with measured isotopic compositions of lunar samples. We determine that a combination of carbonaceous chondrite-type materials were responsible for the majority of water (and nitrogen) delivered to the Earth–Moon system. Crucially, we conclude that comets containing water enriched in deuterium contributed significantly <20% of the water in the Moon. Therefore, our work places important constraints on the types of objects impacting the Moon ∼4.5–4.3 billion years ago and on the origin of water in the inner Solar System.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms11684

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asteroids are characterized by large amount of volatiles, including ~1-15% water, hydrocarbons, organic compounds, and sulfur with an elemental content of a few percent.

    “For the asteroids, they are characterized by large amount of volatiles, including ~1-15% water, 236 hydrocarbons, organic compounds, and sulfur with an elemental content of a few percent.”

    From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [236]

    The Discussion describes water-rich carbonaceous-chondrite asteroids, and Methods > Mixing models mentions water hosted in phyllosilicates and organic matter compounds. The cited paper does not substantiate the claim’s ~1–15% water range, hydrocarbons, or sulfur content of a few percent; it also discusses particular asteroid types rather than asteroids generally. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nakajima M. & Stevenson D. J. in 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 2770, (2014).
  2. Robinson K. L.. in 45th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1607, (2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, J. J., Kring, D. A., Tartèse, R., Franchi, I. A., Anand, M., & Russell, S. S.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Lunar and Planetary Institute (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
Corresponding author
Barnes, Jessica J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-05-31
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
11684-11684
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2410907776
Cited by
110
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • USRA Houston Repository (Lunar and Planetary Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNA14AB07A)
  • Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (NNA14AB07A)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (1143585, ST/I001298/1, /L000776/1, ST/L000776/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
lunar water, carbonaceous chondrites, Apollo samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review