Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Jarid2 binds mono-ubiquitylated H2A lysine 119 to mediate crosstalk between Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2

Cooper, Sarah, Grijzenhout, Anne, Underwood, Elizabeth, Ancelin, Katia, Zhang, Tianyi, Nesterova, Tatyana B., Anil-Kirmizitas, Burcu, Bassett, Andrew, Kooistra, Susanne M., Agger, Karl, Helin, Kristian, Heard, Edith, Brockdorff, Neil·2016·Nature Communications

Abstract

The Polycomb repressive complexes PRC1 and PRC2 play a central role in developmental gene regulation in multicellular organisms. PRC1 and PRC2 modify chromatin by catalysing histone H2A lysine 119 ubiquitylation (H2AK119u1), and H3 lysine 27 methylation (H3K27me3), respectively. Reciprocal crosstalk between these modifications is critical for the formation of stable Polycomb domains at target gene loci. While the molecular mechanism for recognition of H3K27me3 by PRC1 is well defined, the interaction of PRC2 with H2AK119u1 is poorly understood. Here we demonstrate a critical role for the PRC2 cofactor Jarid2 in mediating the interaction of PRC2 with H2AK119u1. We identify a ubiquitin interaction motif at the amino-terminus of Jarid2, and demonstrate that this domain facilitates PRC2 localization to H2AK119u1 both in vivo and in vitro . Our findings ascribe a critical function to Jarid2 and define a key mechanism that links PRC1 and PRC2 in the establishment of Polycomb domains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms13661

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 JARID2 is required for recruitment of PRC2 to H2AK119u1 modified chromatin. (a) Schematic of the experiment. The MBD localizes to high meCpG regions including PCH. The minimal E3 ligase fusion protein (RPCD) catalyses H2AK119u1 but does not interact with PRC1 or PRC2. (b) Immunofluorescence staining of WT and Aebp2tr/tr mESCs. Scale bar, 5 μm. Arrowhead indicates a PCH focus. (c) Quantification of H3K27me3-positive PCH domains shown in b. (d,e) As (b,c) but for Jarid2 WT and Jarid2 KO mESCs. A minimum of 300 cells were counted in three biological repeats. Error bars indicate s.d.
Figure 1 JARID2 is required for recruitment of PRC2 to H2AK119u1 modified chromatin. (a) Schematic of the experiment. The MBD localizes to high meCpG regions including PCH. The minimal E3 ligase fusion protein (RPCD) catalyses H2AK119u1 but does not interact with PRC1 or PRC2. (b) Immunofluorescence staining of WT and Aebp2tr/tr mESCs. Scale bar, 5 μm. Arrowhead indicates a PCH focus. (c) Quantification of H3K27me3-positive PCH domains shown in b. (d,e) As (b,c) but for Jarid2 WT and Jarid2 KO mESCs. A minimum of 300 cells were counted in three biological repeats. Error bars indicate s.d.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 JARID2 is required for establishment of H3K27me3 at PCH domains upon loss of DNA methylation. (a) Schematic of the experimental set-up. DNA methylation (filled lollipops) was removed by tamoxifen induction of conditional Dnmt1F/F mESCs and culturing for 6–12 days. In response to the loss of DNA methylation PRC1 (H2AK119u1) and PRC2 (H3K27me3) complexes localize to PCH (major satellites). (b) Immunofluorescence staining with H2AK119u1 (left) and quantification of PCH domains (right) of Dnmt1−/− and Dnmt−/− Jarid2 KO mESCs. (c) As (b), except staining and quantification for H3K27me3. A minimum of 300 cells were counted in three biological repeats. Error bars indicate s.d. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Figure 2 JARID2 is required for establishment of H3K27me3 at PCH domains upon loss of DNA methylation. (a) Schematic of the experimental set-up. DNA methylation (filled lollipops) was removed by tamoxifen induction of conditional Dnmt1F/F mESCs and culturing for 6–12 days. In response to the loss of DNA methylation PRC1 (H2AK119u1) and PRC2 (H3K27me3) complexes localize to PCH (major satellites). (b) Immunofluorescence staining with H2AK119u1 (left) and quantification of PCH domains (right) of Dnmt1−/− and Dnmt−/− Jarid2 KO mESCs. (c) As (b), except staining and quantification for H3K27me3. A minimum of 300 cells were counted in three biological repeats. Error bars indicate s.d. Scale bars, 5 μm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 A ubiquitin binding motif in the Jarid2 N-terminus mediates interaction with H2AK119u1. (a) Schematic showing full length JARID2 and complementation constructs, UIM, ubiquitin interaction motif; TRD, transcription repressive domain; JmjN, JumonjiN; JmjC, JumonjiC; and ZF, zinc finger domain. (b) Levels of restoration of H3K27me3 in response to H2AK119u1 after complementation by the constructs in a. (c) Consensus UIM sequence and alignment of single-sided UIMs with sequence from Jarid2 N-terminus. (d) JARID2 UIM peptide interacts with ubiquitin. Coumarin-JARID2 24–43 binds to WT ubiquitin (yellow) more strongly that I44A ubiquitin (red) as monitored by fluorescence polarization (n=3). (e) Co-localization of EZH2 with Xist-Bgl-mCherry domains in wild type, Jarid2 null mESCs and in mESC cell lines complemented with the indicated constructs. A minimum of 200 Xist-Bgl-mCherry-positive cells were counted in three biological repeats in all experiments. Error bars indicate s.d.
Figure 3 A ubiquitin binding motif in the Jarid2 N-terminus mediates interaction with H2AK119u1. (a) Schematic showing full length JARID2 and complementation constructs, UIM, ubiquitin interaction motif; TRD, transcription repressive domain; JmjN, JumonjiN; JmjC, JumonjiC; and ZF, zinc finger domain. (b) Levels of restoration of H3K27me3 in response to H2AK119u1 after complementation by the constructs in a. (c) Consensus UIM sequence and alignment of single-sided UIMs with sequence from Jarid2 N-terminus. (d) JARID2 UIM peptide interacts with ubiquitin. Coumarin-JARID2 24–43 binds to WT ubiquitin (yellow) more strongly that I44A ubiquitin (red) as monitored by fluorescence polarization (n=3). (e) Co-localization of EZH2 with Xist-Bgl-mCherry domains in wild type, Jarid2 null mESCs and in mESC cell lines complemented with the indicated constructs. A minimum of 200 Xist-Bgl-mCherry-positive cells were counted in three biological repeats in all experiments. Error bars indicate s.d.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 JARID2 N-terminus mediates direct interaction with H2AK119u1-modified nucleosomes (a) Immunoblot of nucleosomal pull downs from nuclear extract. Total nuclear extract (input) and pull down using streptavidin beads, unmodified nucleosomes or nucleosomes modified by H2AK119u1/H2AK119u1(I44A) were probed with the indicated antibodies using extracts from WT cells (left) or JARID2 KO mESCs (right). Full blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. (b) JARID2 1–530 binds to H2AK119u1-modified mononucleosomes (yellow) more tightly than unmodified (blue) or H2AK199u1(I44A) (red) as monitored by biolayer interferometry (n=3).
Figure 4 JARID2 N-terminus mediates direct interaction with H2AK119u1-modified nucleosomes (a) Immunoblot of nucleosomal pull downs from nuclear extract. Total nuclear extract (input) and pull down using streptavidin beads, unmodified nucleosomes or nucleosomes modified by H2AK119u1/H2AK119u1(I44A) were probed with the indicated antibodies using extracts from WT cells (left) or JARID2 KO mESCs (right). Full blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. (b) JARID2 1–530 binds to H2AK119u1-modified mononucleosomes (yellow) more tightly than unmodified (blue) or H2AK199u1(I44A) (red) as monitored by biolayer interferometry (n=3).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Schwartz, Y. B. & Pirrotta, V. A new world of Polycombs: unexpected partnerships and emerging functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 853–864 (2013). · DOI
  2. Mendenhall, E. M. et al. GC-rich sequence elements recruit PRC2 in mammalian ES cells. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001244 (2010). · DOI
  3. Silva, J. et al. Establishment of histone h3 methylation on the inactive X chromosome requires transient recruitment of Eed-Enx1 polycomb group complexes. Dev. Cell 4, 481–495 (2003). · DOI
  4. Plath, K. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300, 131–135 (2003). · DOI
  5. de Napoles, M. et al. Polycomb group proteins Ring1A/B link ubiquitylation of histone H2A to heritable gene silencing and X inactivation. Dev. Cell 7, 663–676 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Puschendorf, M. et al. PRC1 and Suv39h specify parental asymmetry at constitutive heterochromatin in early mouse embryos. Nat. Genet. 40, 411–420 (2008). · DOI
  7. Tavares, L. et al. RYBP-PRC1 complexes mediate H2A ubiquitylation at polycomb target sites independently of PRC2 and H3K27me3. Cell 148, 664–678 (2012). · DOI
  8. Farcas, A. M. et al. KDM2B links the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to recognition of CpG islands. Elife 1, e00205 (2012). · DOI
  9. He, J. et al. Kdm2b maintains murine embryonic stem cell status by recruiting PRC1 complex to CpG islands of developmental genes. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 373–384 (2013). · DOI
  10. Wu, X., Johansen, J. V. & Helin, K. Fbxl10/Kdm2b recruits polycomb repressive complex 1 to CpG islands and regulates H2A ubiquitylation. Mol. Cell 49, 1134–1146 (2013). · DOI
  11. Blackledge, N. P. et al. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation. Cell 157, 1445–1459 (2014). · DOI
  12. Cooper, S. et al. Targeting polycomb to pericentric heterochromatin in embryonic stem cells reveals a role for H2AK119u1 in PRC2 recruitment. Cell Rep. 7, 1456–1470 (2014). · DOI
  13. Kalb, R. et al. Histone H2A monoubiquitination promotes histone H3 methylation in Polycomb repression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 569–571 (2014). · DOI
  14. Landeira, D. et al. Jarid2 is a PRC2 component in embryonic stem cells required for multi-lineage differentiation and recruitment of PRC1 and RNA Polymerase II to developmental regulators. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 618–624 (2010). · DOI
  15. Li, G. et al. Jarid2 and PRC2, partners in regulating gene expression. Genes Dev. 24, 368–380 (2010). · DOI
  16. da Rocha, S. T. et al. Jarid2 is implicated in the initial Xist-induced targeting of PRC2 to the inactive X chromosome. Mol. Cell 53, 301–316 (2014). · DOI
  17. Moindrot, B. et al. A pooled shRNA screen identifies Rbm15, Spen, and Wtap as factors required for Xist RNA-mediated silencing. Cell Rep. 12, 562–572 (2015). · DOI
  18. Sarma, K. et al. ATRX directs binding of PRC2 to Xist RNA and Polycomb targets. Cell 159, 869–883 (2014). · DOI
  19. Lewandoski, M., Wassarman, K. M. & Martin, G. R. Zp3-cre, a transgenic mouse line for the activation or inactivation of loxP-flanked target genes specifically in the female germ line. Curr. Biol. 7, 148–151 (1997). · DOI
  20. Pasini, D. et al. JARID2 regulates binding of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 to target genes in ES cells. Nature 464, 306–310 (2010). · DOI
  21. Sanulli, S. et al. Jarid2 methylation via the PRC2 complex regulates H3K27me3 deposition during cell differentiation. Mol. Cell 57, 769–783 (2015). · DOI
  22. Hirano, S. et al. Double-sided ubiquitin binding of Hrs-UIM in endosomal protein sorting. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 272–277 (2006). · DOI
  23. Qin, W. et al. DNA methylation requires a DNMT1 ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) and histone ubiquitination. Cell Res. 25, 911–929 (2015). · DOI
  24. Fisher, R. D. et al. Structure and ubiquitin binding of the ubiquitin-interacting motif. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 28976–28984 (2003). · DOI
  25. Arrigoni, R. et al. The Polycomb-associated protein Rybp is a ubiquitin binding protein. FEBS Lett. 580, 6233–6241 (2006). · DOI
  26. Son, J., Shen, S. S., Margueron, R. & Reinberg, D. Nucleosome-binding activities within JARID2 and EZH1 regulate the function of PRC2 on chromatin. Genes Dev. 27, 2663–2677 (2013). · DOI
  27. Shen, X. et al. Jumonji modulates polycomb activity and self-renewal versus differentiation of stem cells. Cell 139, 1303–1314 (2009). · DOI
  28. Peng, J. C. et al. Jarid2/Jumonji coordinates control of PRC2 enzymatic activity and target gene occupancy in pluripotent cells. Cell 139, 1290–1302 (2009). · DOI
  29. Mysliwiec, M. R., Bresnick, E. H. & Lee, Y. Endothelial Jarid2/Jumonji is required for normal cardiac development and proper Notch1 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 17193–17204 (2011). · DOI
  30. Faust, C., Schumacher, A., Holdener, B. & Magnuson, T. The eed mutation disrupts anterior mesoderm production in mice. Development 121, 273–285 (1995). · DOI
  31. Baumann, C. & De La Fuente, R. ATRX marks the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in somatic cells and during imprinted X chromosome inactivation in trophoblast stem cells. Chromosoma 118, 209–222 (2009). · DOI
  32. Brooun, A. et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 structure with inhibitor reveals a mechanism of activation and drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 7, 11384 (2016). · DOI
  33. Justin, N. et al. Structural basis of oncogenic histone H3K27M inhibition of human polycomb repressive complex 2. Nat. Commun. 7, 11316 (2016). · DOI
  34. Grijzenhout, A. et al. Functional analysis of AEBP2, a PRC2 Polycomb protein, reveals a Trithorax phenotype in embryonic development and in ESCs. Development 143, 2716–2723 (2016). · DOI
  35. Sharif, J. et al. The SRA protein Np95 mediates epigenetic inheritance by recruiting Dnmt1 to methylated DNA. Nature 450, 908–912 (2007). · DOI
  36. Cooper, S. & Brockdorff, N. Genome-wide shRNA screening to identify factors mediating Gata6 repression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development 140, 4110–4115 (2013). · DOI
  37. Zvetkova, et al. Global hypomethylation of the genome in XX embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 37, 1274–1279 (2005). · DOI
  38. Okamoto, I., Otte, A. P., Allis, C. D., Reinberg, D. & Heard, E. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303, 644–649 (2004). · DOI
  39. Long, L., Furgason, M. & Yao, T. Generation of nonhydrolyzable ubiquitin-histone mimics. Methods 70, 134–138 (2014). · DOI
  40. Bartke, T. et al. Nucleosome-interacting proteins regulated by DNA and histone methylation. Cell 143, 470–484 (2010). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, S., Grijzenhout, A., Underwood, E., Ancelin, K., Zhang, T., Nesterova, T. B., Anil-Kirmizitas, B., Bassett, A., Kooistra, S. M., Agger, K., Helin, K., Heard, E., & Brockdorff, N.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2016-11-28
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
296
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review