The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum interferometric visibility as a witness of general relativistic proper time
Open accessAbstract
Current attempts to probe general relativistic effects in quantum mechanics focus on precision measurements of phase shifts in matter–wave interferometry. Yet, phase shifts can always be explained as arising because of an Aharonov–Bohm effect, where a particle in a flat space–time is subject to an effective potential. Here we propose a quantum effect that cannot be explained without the general relativistic notion of proper time. We consider interference of a 'clock'—a particle with evolving internal degrees of freedom—that will not only display a phase shift, but also reduce the visibility of the interference pattern. According to general relativity, proper time flows at different rates in different regions of space–time. Therefore, because of quantum complementarity, the visibility will drop to the extent to which the path information becomes available from reading out the proper time from the 'clock'. Such a gravitationally induced decoherence would provide the first test of the genuine general relativistic notion of proper time in quantum mechanics. In the theory of general relativity time flows at different rates depending on the space–time geometry. Here, a drop in the visibility of a quantum 'clock' interference in a gravitational potential is predicted, which cannot be explained without the general relativistic notion of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (1993) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511564246 · Cited by 3,632
The maximum speed of dynamical evolution
Margolus, N., & Levitin, L. B. (1998) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00054-2 · Cited by 887
Fringe Visibility and Which-Way Information: An Inequality
Englert, B.-G. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2154 · Cited by 821 · cited 1×
“The distinguishability D of the trajectories is the probability to correctly guess which path was taken in the two-way interferometer by measuring the degrees of freedom that serve as a which-way detector [12] (in mathematical terms it is the trace norm distance between the final states of the detectors associated wit…”
BackgroundA unitarity bound on the evolution of nonstationary states
Fleming, G. N. (1973) · Il Nuovo Cimento A · doi:10.1007/bf02819419 · Cited by 218
Cited by
Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications
Bongs, K., Holynski, M., Vovrosh, J., Bouyer, P., Condon, G., Rasel, E., Schubert, C., Schleich, W. P., & Roura, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0117-4 · Cited by 382
Universal decoherence due to gravitational time dilation
Pikovski, I., Zych, M., Costa, F., & Brukner, Č. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3366 · Cited by 275
Self-citationQuantum speed limit for mixed states using an experimentally realizable metric
Mondal, D., & Pati, A. K. (2016) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2016.02.018 · Cited by 78
A lab-based test of the gravitational redshift with a miniature clock network
Zheng, X., Dolde, J., Cambria, M. C., Lim, H. M., & Kolkowitz, S. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40629-8 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Zych, M., Costa, F., Pikovski, I., & Brukner, Č.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2011-10-18
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 505-505
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154424188
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.