Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic barcode assay for genetic detection of pathogens

Open access
Liong, Monty, Hoang, Anh N., Chung, Jaehoon, Gural, Nil, Ford, Christopher B., Min, Changwook, Shah, Rupal R., Ahmad, Rushdy, Fernandez-Suarez, Marta, Fortune, Sarah M., Toner, Mehmet, Lee, Hakho, Weissleder, Ralph·2013·Nature Communications

Abstract

The task of rapidly identifying patients infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in resource-constrained environments remains a challenge. A sensitive and robust platform that does not require bacterial isolation or culture is critical in making informed diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Here we introduce a platform for the detection of nucleic acids based on a magnetic barcoding strategy. PCR-amplified mycobacterial genes are sequence-specifically captured on microspheres, labelled by magnetic nanoprobes and detected by nuclear magnetic resonance. All components are integrated into a single, small fluidic cartridge for streamlined on-chip operation. We use this platform to detect M. tuberculosis and identify drug-resistance strains from mechanically processed sputum samples within 2.5 h. The specificity of the assay is confirmed by detecting a panel of clinically relevant non-M. tuberculosis bacteria, and the clinical utility is demonstrated by the measurements in M. tuberculosis-positive patient specimens. Combined with portable systems, the magnetic barcode assay holds promise to become a sensitive, high-throughput and low-cost platform for point-of-care diagnostics. Detecting and phenotyping Mycobacterium tuberculosis, especially in resource-limited settings, is important for global tuberculosis control. Here Liong et al. report a point-of-care diagnostic platform based on magnetic barcoding and nuclear magnetic resonance for the detection of mycobacterial nucleic acids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ncomms2745

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Liong, M., Hoang, A. N., Chung, J., Gural, N., Ford, C. B., Min, C., Shah, R. R., Ahmad, R., Fernandez-Suarez, M., Fortune, S. M., Toner, M., Lee, H., & Weissleder, R.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2013-04-23
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1752-1752
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095265515
Cited by
189
References
2
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic barcode assay for genetic detection of pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/ncomms2745
The paper
Liong, M., Hoang, A. N., Chung, J., Gural, N., Ford, C. B., Min, C., Shah, R. R., Ahmad, R., Fernandez-Suarez, M., Fortune, S. M., Toner, M., Lee, H., & Weissleder, R. (2013). Magnetic barcode assay for genetic detection of pathogens. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2745

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.